Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19484381›Full record

ReviewHeart failure reviews2010

Echocardiography in the assessment of left ventricular longitudinal systolic function: current methodology and clinical applications.

Valerio Zacà, Piercarlo Ballo, Maurizio Galderisi, Sergio Mondillo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Heart failure reviews, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed, 36 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Observational
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Evolution of strain and strain rate values throughout gestation in healthy fetuses.The international journal of cardiovascular imaging · 2020
    Observational
  10. Assessment of left ventricular systolic function after VSD transcatheter device closure using speckle tracking echocardiography.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2019
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Valerio ZacàDepartment of Cardiovascular Diseases, University of Siena, Viale Bracci 1, 53100 Siena, Italy. valezeta@libero.it
Piercarlo Ballo
Maurizio Galderisi
Sergio Mondillo
University of Siena · ITCTO Andrea Alesini · ITFederico II University Hospital · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantification of left ventricular (LV) systolic function represents a major aspect of echocardiographic assessment in the spectrum of cardiac diseases. However, because of the high complexity of LV contraction mechanics, the classical approach with assessment of a single measure of systolic function, such as ejection fraction or fractional shortening, has been largely superseded. During the last years, through the considerable technical advances in the field of ultrasonography, a number of different echocardiographic methodologies have become available to perform a detailed assessment of different aspects of LV contraction. In particular, evaluation of LV longitudinal systolic dynamics has progressively gained importance as a key aspect in the assessment of LV systolic function. For most of the techniques currently used to explore LV longitudinal function, the clinical usefulness in both research and daily practice has been validated by consistent evidence and their use is rapidly increasing. Technical considerations and potential clinical applications of the assessment of LV longitudinal systolic function are reviewed.

Indexed as

Echocardiography, DopplerVentricular Function, LeftHeart DiseasesHeart Failure, SystolicHumansPredictive Value of TestsRisk AssessmentSensitivity and SpecificityStroke VolumeSystoleVentricular Dysfunction, Left

Identifiers

PMID19484381
OpenAlexW2011559527

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.