Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19484350›Full record

ReviewTechniques in coloproctology2009

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: indications, results and controversies.

Andre Roncon Dias, Caio Sergio Rizkallah Nahas, Carlos Frederico Sparapan Marques, Sergio Carlos Nahas, Ivan Cecconello

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Techniques in coloproctology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
3.0field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 54 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Evolution of Transanal Total Mesorectal Excision.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2020
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Transanal Approach to Rectal Polyps and Cancer.Clinics in colon and rectal surgery · 2016
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Local excision by transanal endoscopic surgery.World journal of gastroenterology · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery.Techniques in coloproctology · 2013
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Transanal endoscopic microsurgery vs. laparoscopic total mesorectal excision for T2N0 rectal cancer.Journal of gastrointestinal surgery : official journal of the Society for Surgery of the Alimentary Tract · 2012
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Glove port technique for transanal endoscopic microsurgery.International journal of surgical oncology · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Andre Roncon DiasDepartment of Gastroenterology, Division of Colorectal Surgery, Hospital das Clinicas, University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, Brazil.
Caio Sergio Rizkallah Nahas
Carlos Frederico Sparapan Marques
Sergio Carlos Nahas
Ivan Cecconello
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo · BRUniversidade de São Paulo · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM) was introduced in 1983 as a minimally invasive technique allowing the resection of adenomas and early rectal carcinomas unsuitable for local or colonoscopic excision which would otherwise require major surgery. After 25 years, there is still much debate about the procedure. This article presents the TEM technique, indications, results and complications, focusing on its role in rectal cancer. The controversial points addressed include long-term results, TEM in high-risk T1 lesions, TEM associated with combined modality therapy (CMT) for invasive rectal cancer and salvage therapy after TEM. The future perspectives for TEM are promising and its association with CMT will probably expand the select group of patients who will benefit from the procedure.

Indexed as

EndoscopyMicrosurgeryAdenomaAnal CanalCarcinomaHumansPatient SelectionRectal NeoplasmsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID19484350
OpenAlexW1994495649

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.