Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19484213›Full record

ArticleDer Nervenarzt2009

[Community-based crisis home programme. Cost-efficient alternative to psychiatric hospitalization].

K Lötscher, H H Stassen, D Hell, R Bridler

Abstract readComparative StudyControlled Clinical TrialEnglish Abstract
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Der Nervenarzt, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 91% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

K LötscherZentrum für Gemeinde- und Familienpsychiatrie, Psychiatrische Universitätsklinik, Heliosstrasse 32, 8032, Zürich, Schweiz. katharina.loetscher@puk.zh.ch
H H Stassen
D Hell
R Bridler
Universitäre Psychiatrische Kliniken Basel · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundOver recent decades, institutional psychiatric care has shifted its focus from traditional inpatient treatment to a variety of more advanced outpatient services. Within this context, a new "crisis home" programme (CHP) was launched in Zurich on 1 January 2005. With this programme, mentally ill patients can avoid hospitalization by living with a host family for a certain time period while receiving standard outpatient care. In this study we addressed the question of whether the quite substantial financial advantages of the Zurich CHP over traditional inpatient care are achieved at the expense of a reduced quality of care. SAMPLE AND

methodsBetween 1 January 2005 and 30 June 2007, a total of 33 patients enrolled in the Zurich CHP with an average stay of 19 days at host families. The vast majority of the patients (85%) were moderately to severely ill at study entry. Of these patients data were collected in a standardized way on the basis of five rating instruments. The statistical data analysis included cross-comparisons with corresponding inpatient data.

resultsResults showed that (1) the CHP works well in a routine setting and provides cost-efficient interventions for patients in acute crises; (2) the financial advantages of the Zurich host family programme over traditional inpatient care do not lead to a reduced quality in patient care; (3) patients suffering from severe mental illnesses clearly benefit from this programme, thus avoiding hospitalization.

conclusionsThe Zurich CHP is a cost-efficient alternative to traditional inpatient treatment. Specifically, our results suggest that this type of acute crisis intervention should be established as a standard psychiatric care service.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCommunity Health ServicesCost-Benefit AnalysisCrisis InterventionGermanyHealth Care CostsHome Care ServicesHospitals, PsychiatricHumansMental DisordersMiddle AgedPilot ProjectsTreatment Outcome

Identifiers

PMID19484213
OpenAlexW1542951842

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.