Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19483816›Full record

ArticleOptics express2004

Motion artifacts in optical coherence tomography with frequency-domain ranging.

S H Yun, G Tearney, J de Boer, B Bouma

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Optics express, 2004. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 89 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
89citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

89 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Wave-based optical coherence elastography: The 10-year perspective.Progress in biomedical engineering (Bristol, England) · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

29 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S H Yun
G Tearney
J de Boer
B Bouma

Funding

Improving screening &surveillance in Barrett's patientsR01CA103769 · NCI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI TEARNEY, GUILLERMO J · 2003 to 2014
$5.1M
Fast OCT technology for comprehensive diagnostic imagingR01RR019768 · NCRR · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI DE BOER, JOHANNES F · 2003 to 2006
$2.0M
In-site Measurement of Plaque Biomechanical PropertiesR01HL070039 · NHLBI · MASSACHUSETTS GENERAL HOSPITAL · PI BOUMA, BRETT E · 2002 to 2005
$1.4M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA103769NCRR NIH HHS R01 RR019768NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL070039
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We describe results of theoretical and experimental investigations of artifacts that can arise in spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and optical frequency domain imaging (OFDI) as a result of sample or probe beam motion. While SD-OCT and OFDI are based on similar spectral interferometric principles, the specifics of motion effects are quite different because of distinct signal acquisition methods. These results provide an understanding of motion artifacts such as signal fading, spatial distortion and blurring, and emphasize the need for fast image acquisition in biomedical applications.

Identifiers

PMID19483816
PMCPMC2752339

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.