Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19483712›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Microbiology2009

Myths and misconceptions: the origin and evolution of Mycobacterium tuberculosis.

Noel H Smith, R Glyn Hewinson, Kristin Kremer, Roland Brosch, Stephen V Gordon

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Microbiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 85 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
85citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

85 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. InsideFrontiers in microbiology · 2024
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. The rate and role of pseudogenes of theMicrobial genomics · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Pathogenomic analyses ofMicrobial genomics · 2021
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

25 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Noel H SmithVeterinary Laboratories Agency (VLA), Weybridge, New Haw, Addlestone, Surrey KT15 3NB, UK. noel@sussex.ac.uk
R Glyn Hewinson
Kristin Kremer
Roland Brosch
Stephen V Gordon

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Much effort has been spent trying to work out the origin and history of tuberculosis. Understanding these concepts could have important consequences for the development of vaccines and therapies that are effective against all strains of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. We discuss a series of misconceptions about the origin of both M. tuberculosis and the disease it causes that have arisen over the years, and identify a number of unanswered questions that could provide insight into both these areas.

Indexed as

Biological EvolutionAnimalsHumansMycobacterium tuberculosisPhylogenyTuberculosis

Identifiers

PMID19483712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.