ArticleJournal of molecular biology2009
Internal regulatory interactions determine DNA binding specificity by a Hox transcription factor.
Article in Journal of molecular biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
17 citing papers in PubMed.
- Modular Scaffold Crystals for Programmable Installation and Structural Observation of DNA-Binding Proteins.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
- Homeodomain Involvement in Nuclear HOX Protein Homo- and Heterodimerization.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
- Fuzzy protein-DNA interactions and beyond: A common theme in transcription?Current opinion in structural biology · 2024Review
- Article
- Features of molecular recognition of intrinsically disordered proteins via coupled folding and binding.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2019Review
- Pax3/7 duplicated and diverged independently in amphioxus, the basal chordate lineage.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- Thermodynamics of Conformational Transitions in a Disordered Protein Backbone Model.Biophysical journal · 2018Article
- Intrinsic Disorder and Posttranslational Modifications: The Darker Side of the Biological Dark Matter.Frontiers in genetics · 2018Review
- Flexibility and Disorder in Gene Regulation: LacI/GalR and Hox Proteins.The Journal of biological chemistry · 2015Review
- Identification of multiple dityrosine bonds in materials composed of theAdvanced functional materials · 2015Article
- Functional interplay between the RK motif and linker segment dictates Oct4-DNA recognition.Nucleic acids research · 2015Article
- Rethinking gene regulatory networks in light of alternative splicing, intrinsically disordered protein domains, and post-translational modifications.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2015Article
- Article
- Evolution of a derived protein-protein interaction between HoxA11 and Foxo1a in mammals caused by changes in intramolecular regulation.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011Article
- Functional synthetic Antennapedia genes and the dual roles of YPWM motif and linker size in transcriptional activation and repression.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011Article
- Dissecting the functional specificities of two Hox proteins.Genes & development · 2010Article
- Origins of specificity in protein-DNA recognition.Annual review of biochemistry · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In developing bilaterans, the Hox transcription factor family regulates batteries of downstream genes to diversify serially repeated units. Given Hox homeodomains bind a wider array of DNA binding sites in vitro than are regulated by the full-length protein in vivo, regions outside the homeodomain must aid DNA site selection. Indeed, we find affinity for disparate DNA sequences varies less than 3-fold for the homeodomain isolated from the Drosophila Hox protein Ultrabithorax Ia (UbxHD), whereas for the full-length protein (UbxIa) affinity differs by more than 10-fold. The rank order of preferred DNA sequences also differs, further demonstrating distinct DNA binding preferences. The increased specificity of UbxIa can be partially attributed to the I1 region, which lies adjacent to the homeodomain and directly impacts binding energetics. Each of three segments within I1-the Extradenticle-binding YPWM motif, the six amino acids immediately N-terminal to this motif, and the eight amino acids abutting the YPWM C-terminus-uniquely contribute to DNA specificity. Combination of these regions synergistically modifies DNA binding to further enhance specificity. Intriguingly, the presence of the YPWM motif in UbxIa inhibits DNA binding only to Ubx-Extradenticle heterodimer binding sites, potentially functioning in vivo to prevent Ubx monomers from binding and misregulating heterodimer target genes. However, removal of the surrounding region allows the YPWM motif to also inhibit binding to Hox-only recognition sequences. Despite a modular domain design for Hox proteins, these results suggest that multiple Hox protein regions form a network of regulatory interactions that coordinate context- and gene-specific responses. Since most nonhomeodomain regions are not conserved between Hox family members, these regulatory interactions have the potential to diversify binding by the highly homologous Hox homeodomains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.