Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19481039›Full record

ReviewJournal of feline medicine and surgery2009

Feline infectious peritonitis. ABCD guidelines on prevention and management.

Diane Addie, Sándor Belák, Corine Boucraut-Baralon, Herman Egberink, Tadeusz Frymus, Tim Gruffydd-Jones, Katrin Hartmann, Margaret J Hosie, Albert Lloret, Hans Lutz and 6 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of feline medicine and surgery, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 151 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
151citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
15.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

151 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 295 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Immunomodulatory Effects ofInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2026
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article

91 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 4 institutions in 4 countries.

Diane AddieEuropean Advisory Board on Cat Diseases (ABCD). draddie@btinternet.com
Sándor Belák
Corine Boucraut-Baralon
Herman Egberink
Tadeusz Frymus
Tim Gruffydd-Jones
Katrin Hartmann
Margaret J Hosie
Albert Lloret
Hans Lutz
Fulvio Marsilio
Maria Grazia Pennisi
Alan D Radford
Etienne Thiry
Uwe Truyen
Marian C Horzinek
Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München · DEUniversity of Liège · BEUniversity of Liverpool · GBUniversity of Teramo · IT

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/D008425/1Medical Research Council G0300387
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

overviewFeline coronavirus infection is ubiquitous in domestic cats, and is particularly common where conditions are crowded. While most FCoV-infected cats are healthy or display only a mild enteritis, some go on to develop feline infectious peritonitis, a disease that is especially common in young cats and multi-cat environments. Up to 12% of FCoV-infected cats may succumb to FIP, with stress predisposing to the development of disease. DISEASE SIGNS: The 'wet' or effusive form, characterised by polyserositis (abdominal and/or thoracic effusion) and vasculitis, and the 'dry' or non-effusive form (pyogranulomatous lesions in organs) reflect clinical extremes of a continuum. The clinical picture of FIP is highly variable, depending on the distribution of the vasculitis and pyogranulomatous lesions. Fever refractory to antibiotics, lethargy, anorexia and weight loss are common non-specific signs. Ascites is the most obvious manifestation of the effusive form. DIAGNOSIS: The aetiological diagnosis of FIP ante-mortem may be difficult, if not impossible. The background of the cat, its history, the clinical signs, laboratory changes, antibody titres and effusion analysis should all be used to help in decision-making about further diagnostic procedures. At the time of writing, there is no non-invasive confirmatory test available for cats without effusion. DISEASE MANAGEMENT: In most cases FIP is fatal. Supportive treatment is aimed at suppressing the inflammatory and detrimental immune response. However, there are no controlled studies to prove any beneficial effect of corticosteroids. VACCINATION RECOMMENDATIONS: At present, only one (intranasal) FIP vaccine is available, which is considered as being non-core. Kittens may profit from vaccination when they have not been exposed to FCoV (eg, in an early-weaning programme), particularly if they enter a FCoV-endemic environment.

Indexed as

Practice Guidelines as TopicAnimalsCatsCoronavirus, FelineDiagnosis, DifferentialFeline Infectious PeritonitisSocietiesUnited StatesVeterinary MedicineViral VaccinesViral Vaccines

Identifiers

PMID19481039
PMCPMC7129471
OpenAlexW2037764279

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.