ArticleHereditary cancer in clinical practice2009
Factors associated with testicular self-examination among unaffected men from multiple-case testicular cancer families.
Article in Hereditary cancer in clinical practice, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.
- Enhancing Testicular Cancer Prevention Among University Students: A Health Belief Model and Social Support Intervention.Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP · 2024Article
- Perception, knowledge, and factors influencing Saudi nursing students toward practicing testicular self-examination: A cross-sectional study.Journal of education and health promotion · 2024Article
- Reasons behind the Delayed Diagnosis of Testicular Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- The effect of educational intervention based on health belief model and social support on testicular self-examination in sample of Iranian men.BMC cancer · 2021Article
- Cancer education matters: a report on testicular cancer knowledge, awareness, and self-examination practice among young Polish men.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- [Knowledge and early detection of testicular germ cell cancer among adolescents and young adults].Der Urologe. Ausg. A · 2019Article
- Attitudes Toward Testicular Cancer and Self-Examination Among Northern Irish Males.American journal of men's health · 2017Article
- Close ties: an exploratory Colored Eco-Genetic Relationship Map (CEGRM) study of social connections of men in Familial Testicular Cancer (FTC) families.Hereditary cancer in clinical practice · 2012Article
- Exploring disparities and variability in perceptions and self-reported colorectal cancer screening among three ethnic subgroups of U. S. Blacks.Oncology nursing forum · 2010Article
- Familial testicular germ cell tumors in adults: 2010 summary of genetic risk factors and clinical phenotype.Endocrine-related cancer · 2010Review
- Familial testicular germ cell tumours.Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe lifetime testicular cancer (TC) risk in the general population is relatively low (~1 in 250), but men with a family history of TC are at 4 to 9 times greater risk than those without. Some health and professional organizations recommend consideration of testicular self-examination (TSE) for certain high-risk groups (e.g. men with a family history of TC). Yet little is known about factors associated with TSE behaviors in this at-risk group.
methodsWe collected information on this subject during an on-going NCI multidisciplinary, etiologically-focused, cross-sectional Familial Testicular Cancer (FTC) study. We present the first report specifically targeting TSE behaviors among first- and second-degree relatives (n = 99) of affected men from families with >/= 2 TC cases. Demographic, medical, knowledge, health belief, and psychological factors consistent with the Health Belief Model (HBM) were evaluated as variables related to TSE behavior, using chi-square tests of association for categorical variables, and t-tests for continuous variables.
resultsFor men in our sample, 46% (n = 46) reported performing TSE regularly and 51% (n = 50) reported not regularly performing TSE. Factors associated (p < .05) with regularly performing TSE in multivariate analysis were physician recommendation and testicular cancer worry. This is the first study to examine TSE in unaffected men from FTC families.
conclusionThe findings suggest that, even in this high-risk setting, TSE practices are sub-optimal. Our data provide a basis for further exploring psychosocial issues that are specific to men with a family history of TC, and formulating intervention strategies aimed at improving adherence to TSE guidelines.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.