Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19480691›Full record

ArticleHereditary cancer in clinical practice2009

Factors associated with testicular self-examination among unaffected men from multiple-case testicular cancer families.

Susan T Vadaparampil, Richard P Moser, Jennifer Loud, June A Peters, Mark H Greene, Larissa Korde

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Hereditary cancer in clinical practice, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 26 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Reasons behind the Delayed Diagnosis of Testicular Cancer: A Retrospective Analysis.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Familial testicular germ cell tumours.Best practice & research. Clinical endocrinology & metabolism · 2010
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Susan T VadaparampilDivision of Population Sciences, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Flordia, USA. susan.vadaparampil@moffitt.org
Richard P Moser
Jennifer Loud
June A Peters
Mark H Greene
Larissa Korde
National Cancer Institute · USDivision of Cancer Epidemiology and GeneticsMoffitt Cancer Center · US

Funding

Clinical Genetic Studies of Familial and Hereditary Cancer SyndromesZIACP010144 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI SAVAGE, SHARON A. · 2009 to 2025
$111.8M
Clinical/Genetic Studies of Family/Hereditary CancersZ01CP010144 · NCI · DIVISION OF CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY AND GENETICS · PI GREENE, MARK H · 2000 to 2008
$1.1M
Intramural NIH HHS Z01 CP010144Intramural NIH HHS Z99 CA999999NCI NIH HHS N02 CP011019NCI NIH HHS N02 CP065504
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe lifetime testicular cancer (TC) risk in the general population is relatively low (~1 in 250), but men with a family history of TC are at 4 to 9 times greater risk than those without. Some health and professional organizations recommend consideration of testicular self-examination (TSE) for certain high-risk groups (e.g. men with a family history of TC). Yet little is known about factors associated with TSE behaviors in this at-risk group.

methodsWe collected information on this subject during an on-going NCI multidisciplinary, etiologically-focused, cross-sectional Familial Testicular Cancer (FTC) study. We present the first report specifically targeting TSE behaviors among first- and second-degree relatives (n = 99) of affected men from families with >/= 2 TC cases. Demographic, medical, knowledge, health belief, and psychological factors consistent with the Health Belief Model (HBM) were evaluated as variables related to TSE behavior, using chi-square tests of association for categorical variables, and t-tests for continuous variables.

resultsFor men in our sample, 46% (n = 46) reported performing TSE regularly and 51% (n = 50) reported not regularly performing TSE. Factors associated (p < .05) with regularly performing TSE in multivariate analysis were physician recommendation and testicular cancer worry. This is the first study to examine TSE in unaffected men from FTC families.

conclusionThe findings suggest that, even in this high-risk setting, TSE practices are sub-optimal. Our data provide a basis for further exploring psychosocial issues that are specific to men with a family history of TC, and formulating intervention strategies aimed at improving adherence to TSE guidelines.

Identifiers

PMID19480691
PMCPMC2696412
OpenAlexW2128608316

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.