Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19479732›Full record

ArticleJournal of computational chemistry2010

Using Gaussian model to improve biological sequence comparison.

Qi Dai, Xiaoqing Liu, Lihua Li, Yuhua Yao, Bin Han, Lei Zhu

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of computational chemistry, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Qi DaiInstitute for Biomedical Engineering and Instrumentation, Hangzhou Dianzi University, Hangzhou 310018, People's Republic of China.
Xiaoqing Liu
Lihua Li
Yuhua Yao
Bin Han
Lei Zhu

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

One of the major tasks in biological sequence analysis is to compare biological sequences, which could serve as evidence of structural and functional conservation, as well as of evolutionary relations among the sequences. Numerous efficient methods have been developed for sequence comparison, but challenges remain. In this article, we proposed a novel method to compare biological sequences based on Gaussian model. Instead of comparing the frequencies of k-words in biological sequences directly, we considered the k-word frequency distribution under Gaussian model which gives the different expression levels of k-words. The proposed method was tested by similarity search, evaluation on functionally related genes, and phylogenetic analysis. The performance of our method was further compared with alignment-based and alignment-free methods. The results demonstrate that Gaussian model provides more information about k-word frequencies and improves the efficiency of sequence comparison.

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalComputational BiologyCoronavirusGenomeModels, BiologicalNormal DistributionPhylogenySequence AlignmentSequence Analysis, DNA

Identifiers

PMID19479732
PMCPMC7166749

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.