Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19479023›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2009

Characterization of the chronic risk and hazard of hazardous air pollutants in the United States using ambient monitoring data.

Michael C McCarthy, Theresa E O'Brien, Jessica G Charrier, Hilary R Hafner

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. 1,3-Butadiene: a ubiquitous environmental mutagen and its associations with diseases.Genes and environment : the official journal of the Japanese Environmental Mutagen Society · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Assessment of Ambient Air Toxics and Wood Smoke Pollution among Communities in Sacramento County.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  11. Vehicular Air Pollution in Houston, Texas: An Intra-Categorical Analysis of Environmental Injustice.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Racial Differences in Perceptions of Air Pollution Health Risk: Does Environmental Exposure Matter?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Health risk assessment of toxic VOCs species for the coal fire well drillers.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2015
    Article
  18. Health of the corporate worker: health risk assessment among staff of a corporate organization in Ghana.Journal of occupational medicine and toxicology (London, England) · 2015
    Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael C McCarthySonoma Technology, Inc., Petaluma, California 94954-6503, USA. mmccarthy@sonomatech.com
Theresa E O'Brien
Jessica G Charrier
Hilary R Hafner

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundAmbient measurements of hazardous air pollutants (air toxics) have been used to validate model-predicted concentrations of air toxics but have not been used to perform risk screening at the national level.

objectivesWe used ambient concentrations of routinely measured air toxics to determine the relative importance of individual air toxics for chronic cancer and noncancer exposures.

methodsWe compiled 3-year averages for ambient measurement of air toxics collected at monitoring locations in the United States from 2003 through 2005. We then used national distributions of risk-weighted concentrations to identify the air toxics of most concern.

resultsConcentrations of benzene, carbon tetrachloride, arsenic, 1,3-butadiene, and acetaldehyde were above the 10(-6) cancer risk level at most sites nationally with a high degree of confidence. Concentrations of tetrachloroethylene, ethylene oxide, acrylonitrile, and 1,4-dichlorobenzene were also often greater than the 10(-6) cancer risk level, but we have less confidence in the estimated risk associated with these pollutants. Formaldehyde and chromium VI concentrations were either above or below the 10(-6) cancer risk level, depending on the choice of agency-recommended 10(-6) level. The method detection limits of eight additional pollutants were too high to rule out that concentrations were above the 10(-6) cancer risk level. Concentrations of 52 compounds compared with chronic noncancer benchmarks indicated that only acrolein concentrations were greater than the noncancer reference concentration at most monitoring sites.

conclusionsMost pollutants with national site-level averages greater than health benchmarks were also pollutants of concern identified in modeled national-scale risk assessments. Current monitoring networks need more sensitive ambient measurement techniques to better characterize the air toxics problem in the United States.

Indexed as

AcetaldehydeAcrylonitrileAirAir PollutantsArsenicBenzeneButadienesCarbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzenesEnvironmental MonitoringEthylene OxideRisk AssessmentUnited States1,3-butadiene4-dichlorobenzeneAcetaldehydeAcrylonitrileAir PollutantsArsenicBenzeneButadienesCarbon TetrachlorideChlorobenzenesEthylene Oxideair qualityair toxicsambient air qualityhazardous air pollutantsrisk screening

Identifiers

PMID19479023
PMCPMC2685843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.