Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19478942›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Prion strain discrimination based on rapid in vivo amplification and analysis by the cell panel assay.

Yervand Eduard Karapetyan, Paula Saá, Sukhvir Paul Mahal, Gian Franco Sferrazza, Alexandra Sherman, Nicole Salès, Charles Weissmann, Corinne Ida Lasmézas

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. The role of prion strain diversity in the development of successful therapeutic treatments.Progress in molecular biology and translational science · 2020
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Cerebellar compartmentation of prion pathogenesis.Brain pathology (Zurich, Switzerland) · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Yervand Eduard KarapetyanDepartment of Infectology, The Scripps Research Institute, Scripps Florida, Jupiter, Florida, United States of America.
Paula Saá
Sukhvir Paul Mahal
Gian Franco Sferrazza
Alexandra Sherman
Nicole Salès
Charles Weissmann
Corinne Ida Lasmézas

Funding

Molecular basis of cell-specific prion strain propagationR01NS059543 · NINDS · SCRIPPS RESEARCH INSTITUTE, THE · PI WEISSMANN, CHARLES · 2007 to 2010
$1.5M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS059543
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prion strain identification has been hitherto achieved using time-consuming incubation time determinations in one or more mouse lines and elaborate neuropathological assessment. In the present work, we make a detailed study of the properties of PrP-overproducing Tga20 mice. We show that in these mice the four prion strains examined are rapidly and faithfully amplified and can subsequently be discriminated by a cell-based procedure, the Cell Panel Assay.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiological AssayBrainMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPrionsPrPC ProteinsPrPSc ProteinsSpecies SpecificityPrionsPrPC ProteinsPrPSc Proteins

Identifiers

PMID19478942
PMCPMC2684634

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.