Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19478492›Full record

ReviewFrontiers of neurology and neuroscience2009

Role of animal studies in the design of clinical trials.

Edward D Hall, Richard J Traystman

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers of neurology and neuroscience, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Importance of Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses of Animal Studies: Challenges for Animal-to-Human Translation.Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science : JAALAS · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Inflammogenesis of Secondary Spinal Cord Injury.Frontiers in cellular neuroscience · 2016
    Review
  7. Investigational agents for treatment of traumatic brain injury.Expert opinion on investigational drugs · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. An update on spinal cord injury research.Neuroscience bulletin · 2013
    Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Edward D Hall
Richard J Traystman

Funding

Sex Steroids and Brain Outcome from Cardiac Arrest/Cardiopulmonary ResuscitationR01NS046072 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI HERSON, PACO S, QUILLINAN, NIDIA · 2002 to 2024
$7.0M
UK Spinal Cord &Brain Injury Research Center Core GrantP30NS051220 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HALL, EDWARD D. · 2005 to 2015
$6.4M
Peroxynitrite-Induced Oxidative Damage in TBIR01NS046566 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF KENTUCKY · PI HALL, EDWARD D · 2004 to 2007
$1.3M
NINDS NIH HHS P30 NS051220NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS046072NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS046566
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Research DesignAnimalsClinical Trials as TopicDisease Models, AnimalHumansNervous System Diseases

Identifiers

PMID19478492
PMCPMC2811045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.