Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19477208›Full record

ArticleJournal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society2009

Controlled and targeted tumor chemotherapy by ultrasound-activated nanoemulsions/microbubbles.

Natalya Y Rapoport, Anne M Kennedy, Jill E Shea, Courtney L Scaife, Kweon-Ho Nam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of controlled release : official journal of the Controlled Release Society, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 198 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
198citing papers in PubMed
17.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

198 citing papers in PubMed, 544 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Stimuli-Responsive Materials for Biomedical Applications.Advanced materials (Deerfield Beach, Fla.) · 2025
    Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Overview of Therapeutic Ultrasound Applications and Safety Considerations: 2024 Update.Journal of ultrasound in medicine : official journal of the American Institute of Ultrasound in Medicine · 2025
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Responsive Supramolecular Polymers for Diagnosis and Treatment.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

138 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Natalya Y RapoportDepartment of Bioengineering, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT 84112, USA. natasha.rapoport@utah.edu
Anne M Kennedy
Jill E Shea
Courtney L Scaife
Kweon-Ho Nam
University of Utah · US

Funding

Acoustically Activated Micellar Drug DeliveryR01EB001033 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI RAPOPORT, NATALYA Y · 2002 to 2010
$2.1M
Acoustically Activated Micellar Drug DeliveryR56EB001033 · NIBIB · UNIVERSITY OF UTAH · PI RAPOPORT, NATALYA Y · 2007 to 2007
$351k
NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB001033NIBIB NIH HHS R01EB001033NIBIB NIH HHS R56 EB001033NIBIB NIH HHS R56EB001033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The paper reports the results of nanotherapy of ovarian, breast, and pancreatic cancerous tumors by paclitaxel-loaded nanoemulsions that convert into microbubbles locally in tumor tissue under the action of tumor-directed therapeutic ultrasound. Tumor accumulation of nanoemulsions was confirmed by ultrasound imaging. Dramatic regression of ovarian, breast, and orthotopic pancreatic tumors was observed in tumor therapy through systemic injections of drug-loaded nanoemulsions combined with therapeutic ultrasound, signifying efficient ultrasound-triggered drug release from tumor-accumulated nanodroplets. The mechanism of drug release in the process of droplet-to-bubble conversion is discussed. No therapeutic effect from the nanodroplet/ultrasound combination was observed without the drug, indicating that therapeutic effect was caused by the ultrasound-enhanced chemotherapeutic action of the tumor-targeted drug, rather than the mechanical or thermal action of ultrasound itself. Tumor recurrence was observed after the completion of the first treatment round; a second treatment round with the same regimen proved less effective, suggesting that drug-resistant cells were either developed or selected during the first treatment round.

Indexed as

MicrobubblesUltrasonicsAnimalsBreast NeoplasmsCarcinomaCell Line, TumorDrug Delivery SystemsEmulsionsFemaleHumansMiceNeoplasmsOvarian NeoplasmsPaclitaxelPancreatic NeoplasmsPhase TransitionEmulsionsPaclitaxel

Identifiers

PMID19477208
PMCPMC2746980
OpenAlexW1995475798

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.