Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19475482›Full record

ArticleChromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology2009

Cruciform-forming inverted repeats appear to have mediated many of the microinversions that distinguish the human and chimpanzee genomes.

Jessica Kolb, Nadia A Chuzhanova, Josef Högel, Karen M Vasquez, David N Cooper, Albino Bacolla, Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Chromosome research : an international journal on the molecular, supramolecular and evolutionary aspects of chromosome biology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. The Landscape of Micro-Inversions Provide Clues for Population Genetic Analysis of Humans.Interdisciplinary sciences, computational life sciences · 2020
    Article
  4. The Cyclically SeasonalFrontiers in genetics · 2020
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. A high resolution map of mammalian X chromosome fragile regions assessed by large-scale comparative genomics.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2014
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Pico-inplace-inversions between human and chimpanzee.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2011
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Evolution in health and medicine Sackler colloquium: Genomic disorders: a window into human gene and genome evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2010
    Review
  18. Non-B DNA structure-induced genetic instability and evolution.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2010
    Review
  19. ULTRA: A Model Based Tool to Detect Tandem Repeats.ACM-BCB ... ... : the ... ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine. ACM Conference on Bioinformatics, Computational Biology and Biomedicine
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.

Jessica KolbInstitute of Human Genetics, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
Nadia A Chuzhanova
Josef Högel
Karen M Vasquez
David N Cooper
Albino Bacolla
Hildegard Kehrer-Sawatzki
Universität Ulm · DEThe University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center · USCardiff University · GBUniversity of Central Lancashire · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Submicroscopic inversions have contributed significantly to the genomic divergence between humans and chimpanzees over evolutionary time. Those microinversions which are flanked by segmental duplications (SDs) are presumed to have originated via non-allelic homologous recombination between SDs arranged in inverted orientation. However, the nature of the mechanisms underlying those inversions which are not flanked by SDs remains unclear. We have investigated 35 such inversions, ranging in size from 51-nt to 22056-nt, with the goal of characterizing the DNA sequences in the breakpoint-flanking regions. Using the macaque genome as an outgroup, we determined the lineage specificity of these inversions and noted that the majority (N = 31; 89%) were associated with deletions (of length between 1-nt and 6754-nt) immediately adjacent to one or both inversion breakpoints. Overrepresentations of both direct and inverted repeats, >or= 6-nt in length and capable of non-B DNA structure formation, were noted in the vicinity of breakpoint junctions suggesting that these repeats could have contributed to double strand breakage. Inverted repeats capable of cruciform structure formation were also found to be a common feature of the inversion breakpoint-flanking regions, consistent with these inversions having originated through the resolution of Holliday junction-like cruciforms. Sequences capable of non-B DNA structure formation have previously been implicated in promoting gross deletions and translocations causing human genetic disease. We conclude that non-B DNA forming sequences may also have promoted the occurrence of mutations in an evolutionary context, giving rise to at least some of the inversion/deletions which now serve to distinguish the human and chimpanzee genomes.

Indexed as

Chromosome InversionGenome, HumanAnimalsBase SequenceChromosome BreakageComputational BiologyDNA, CruciformEvolution, MolecularHumansInverted Repeat SequencesModels, GeneticMolecular Sequence DataPan troglodytesRecombination, GeneticReproducibility of ResultsSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Cruciform

Identifiers

PMID19475482
OpenAlexW2068287374

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.