Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19475400›Full record

ArticlePsychopharmacology2009

Correlates of individual differences in compensatory nicotine self-administration in rats following a decrease in nicotine unit dose.

Andrew C Harris, Paul R Pentel, Mark G LeSage

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Psychopharmacology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 34% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Impact of tobacco regulation on animal research: new perspectives and opportunities.Nicotine & tobacco research : official journal of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco · 2012
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Andrew C HarrisMinneapolis Medical Research Foundation, Minneapolis, MN 55404, USA. harr0547@umn.edu
Paul R Pentel
Mark G LeSage
Hennepin County Medical Center · USOrthopaedic Research Foundation · USUniversity of Minnesota Medical Center · US

Funding

TOBACCO REDUCTION STRATEGIES FOR PATIENTS WITH CARDIAC DISEASEP50DA013333 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI HATSUKAMI, DOROTHY K · 1999 to 2008
$16.8M
Training in PharmacoNeuroImmune Substance Abuse ResearchT32DA007097 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA TWIN CITIES · PI MOLITOR, THOMAS WILLIAM · 1985 to 2021
$13.1M
Compensation of Nicotine Self-AdministrationF32DA021935 · NIDA · HENNEPIN HEALTHCARE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI HARRIS, ANDREW CHARLES · 2007 to 2007
$41k
NIDA NIH HHS F32 DA021935NIDA NIH HHS P50 DA013333NIDA NIH HHS P50-DA013333NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA007097NIDA NIH HHS T32 DA 07097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationaleThe ability of tobacco harm reduction strategies to produce significant reductions in toxin exposure is limited by compensatory increases in smoking behavior. Characterizing factors contributing to the marked individual variability in compensation may be useful for understanding this phenomenon and assessing the feasibility of harm reduction interventions.

objectiveThe objective of the study was to use an animal model of human compensatory smoking that involves a decrease in unit dose supporting nicotine self-administration (NSA) to examine potential contributors to individual differences in compensation.

methodsRats were trained for NSA during daily 23-h sessions at a unit dose of 0.06 mg/kg/inf until responding was stable. The unit dose was then reduced to 0.03 mg/kg/inf for at least 10 sessions. Following reacquisition of NSA at the training dose and extinction, single-dose nicotine pharmacokinetic parameters were determined.

resultsDecreases in nicotine intake following dose reduction were proportionally less than the decrease in unit dose, indicating partial compensation. Compensatory increases in infusion rates were observed across the course of the 23-h sessions. The magnitude of compensation differed considerably between rats. Rats exhibiting the highest baseline infusion rates exhibited the lowest levels of compensation. Nicotine pharmacokinetic parameters were not significantly correlated with compensation. Infusion rates immediately returned to pre-reduction levels when baseline conditions were restored.

conclusionsThese findings provide initial insights into correlates of individual differences in compensation following a reduction in nicotine unit dose. The present assay may be useful for characterizing mechanisms and potential consequences of the marked individual differences in compensatory smoking observed in humans.

Indexed as

Dose-Response Relationship, DrugAnimalsConditioning, OperantExtinction, PsychologicalMaleNicotineRatsRats, Sprague-DawleySelf AdministrationTime FactorsNicotine

Identifiers

PMID19475400
PMCPMC3601673
OpenAlexW2015420762

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.