ArticleClinical medicine & research2009
Perioperative genomic profiles using structure-specific oligonucleotide probes.
Article in Clinical medicine & research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesMany complications in the perioperative interval are associated with genetic susceptibilities that may be unknown in advance of surgery and anesthesia, including drug toxicity and inefficacy, thrombosis, prolonged neuromuscular blockade, organ failure and sepsis. The aims of this study were to design and validate the first genetic testing platform and panel designed for use in perioperative care, to establish allele frequencies in a target population, and to determine the number of mutant alleles per patient undergoing surgery. DESIGN/SETTING/PARTICIPANTS AND
methodsOne hundred fifty patients at Marshfield Clinic, Marshfield, Wisconsin, 100 patients at the Medical College of Wisconsin Zablocki Veteran's Administration Medical Center, Milwaukee, Wisconsin, and 200 patients at the University of Wisconsin Hospitals and Clinics, Madison, Wisconsin undergoing surgery and anesthesia were tested for 48 polymorphisms in 22 genes including ABC, BChE, ACE, CYP2C9, CYP2C19, CYP2D6, CYP3A4, CYP3A5, beta2AR, TPMT, F2, F5, F7, MTHFR, TNFalpha, TNFbeta, CCR5, ApoE, HBB, MYH7, ABO and Gender (PRKY, PFKFB1). Using structure-specific cleavage of oligonucleotide probes (Invader, Third Wave Technologies, Inc., Madison, WI), 96-well plates were configured so that each well contained reagents for detection of both the wild type and mutant alleles at each locus.
resultsThere were 21,600 genotypes confirmed in duplicate. After withdrawal of polymorphisms in non-pathogenic genes (i.e., the ABO blood group and gender-specific alleles), 376 of 450 patients were found to be homozygous for mutant alleles at one or more loci. Modes of two mutant homozygous loci and 10 mutant alleles in aggregate (i.e., the sum of homozygous and heterozygous mutant polymorphisms) were observed per patient.
conclusionsSignificant genetic heterogeneity that may not be accounted for by taking a family medical history, or by obtaining routine laboratory test results, is present in most patients presenting for surgery and may be detected using a newly developed genotyping platform.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.