Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19474264›Full record

Trial reportClinical and vaccine immunology : CVI2009

Investigation of different group A immunoassays following one dose of meningococcal group A conjugate vaccine or A/C polysaccharide vaccine in adults.

H Findlow, B D Plikaytis, A Aase, M C Bash, H Chadha, C Elie, G Laher, J Martinez, T Herstad, E Newton and 10 more

Open access · diamondAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical and vaccine immunology : CVI, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Bactericidal antibodies against hypervirulentHuman vaccines & immunotherapeutics · 2021
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

20 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

H FindlowVaccine Evaluation Unit, Health Protection Agency North West, Clinical Sciences Building, Manchester Royal Infirmary, Manchester, UK. Helen.findlow@hpa.org.uk
B D Plikaytis
A Aase
M C Bash
H Chadha
C Elie
G Laher
J Martinez
T Herstad
E Newton
S Viviani
C Papaspyridis
P Kulkarni
M Wilding
M P Preziosi
E Marchetti
M Hassan-King
F M La Force
G Carlone
R Borrow
Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research · USNorwegian Institute of Public Health · NOCenters for Disease Control and Prevention · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A double-blind, randomized, controlled phase I study to assess the safety, immunogenicity, and antibody persistence of a new group A conjugate vaccine (PsA-TT) in volunteers aged 18 to 35 years was previously performed. Subjects received one dose of either the PsA-TT conjugate vaccine, meningococcal A/C polysaccharide vaccine (PsA/C), or tetanus toxoid vaccine. The conjugate vaccine was shown to be safe and immunogenic as demonstrated by a standardized group A-specific immunoglobulin G (IgG) enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and by a serum bactericidal antibody (SBA) assay using rabbit complement (rSBA). This report details further analysis of the sera using four additional immunologic assays to investigate the relationship between the different immunoassays. The immunoassays used were an SBA assay that used human complement (hSBA), a group A-specific IgG multiplexed bead assay, and two opsonophagocytic antibody (OPA) assays which used two different methodologies. For each vaccine group, geometric mean concentrations or geometric mean titers were determined for all assays before and 4, 24, and 48 weeks after vaccination. Pearson's correlation coefficients were used to assess the relationship between the six assays using data from all available visits. An excellent correlation was observed between the group A-specific IgG concentrations obtained by ELISA and those obtained by the multiplexed bead assay. hSBA and rSBA titers correlated moderately, although proportions of subjects with putatively protective titers and those demonstrating a > or = 4-fold rise were similar. The two OPA methods correlated weakly and achieved only a low correlation with the other immunoassays. The correlation between hSBA and group A-specific IgG was higher for the PsA-TT group than for the PsA/C group.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAntibodies, BacterialBlood Bactericidal ActivityHumansImmunoassayImmunoglobulin GMeningitis, MeningococcalMeningococcal VaccinesNeisseria meningitidis, Serogroup AOpsonin ProteinsPhagocytosisStatistics as TopicVaccines, CombinedVaccines, ConjugateYoung AdultAntibodies, BacterialImmunoglobulin GMeningococcal VaccinesOpsonin ProteinsVaccines, CombinedVaccines, Conjugate

Identifiers

PMID19474264
PMCPMC2708411
OpenAlexW2125460037

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.