Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19474216›Full record

ReviewBritish journal of anaesthesia2009

Immunomodulation in the critically ill.

N R Webster, H F Galley

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in British journal of anaesthesia, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Observational
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. The immunomodulatory mechanism of dexmedetomidine.International immunopharmacology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. More of the Gut in the Lung: How Two Microbiomes Meet in ARDS.The Yale journal of biology and medicine · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Dynamic changes of circulating T-helper cell subsets following severe thoracic trauma.International journal of clinical and experimental medicine · 2015
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

N R WebsterAnaesthesia and Intensive Care, Institute of Medical Sciences, University of Aberdeen, Foresterhill, Aberdeen, UK.
H F Galley
University of Aberdeen · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Immunotherapy in the critically ill is an appealing notion because of the apparent abnormal immune and inflammatory responses seen in so many patients. The administration of a medication that could alter immune responses and decrease mortality in patients with sepsis could represent a 'magic bullet'. Various approaches have been tried over the last 20 yr: steroids; anti-endotoxin or anti-cytokine antibodies; cytokine receptor antagonists; and other agents with immune-modulating side-effects. However, in some respects, research along these lines has been unsuccessful or disappointing at best. The current state of knowledge is summarized with particular reference to sepsis and the acute respiratory distress syndrome.

Indexed as

Critical IllnessCytokinesGlucocorticoidsHumansImmunologic FactorsImmunotherapyRespiratory Distress SyndromeSepsisSystemic Inflammatory Response SyndromeCytokinesGlucocorticoidsImmunologic Factors

Identifiers

PMID19474216
PMCPMC8543369
OpenAlexW2106658064

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.