ReviewJournal of the Royal Society, Interface2009
Opportunities for microfluidic technologies in synthetic biology.
Review in Journal of the Royal Society, Interface, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
25 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospects and problems in enzyme immobilization methodology: comprehensive review.Biophysical reviews · 2025Review
- Improving engineered biological systems with electronics and microfluidics.Nature biotechnology · 2025Review
- Signaling in microbial communities with open boundaries.Biophysical journal · 2023Article
- Signaling in microbial communities with open boundaries.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023Article
- A Microfluidic Platform for Sequential Assembly and Separation of Synthetic Cell Models.ACS synthetic biology · 2021Article
- A millisecond passive micromixer with low flow rate, low sample consumption and easy fabrication.Scientific reports · 2021Article
- Recent trends in biocatalysis.Chemical Society reviews · 2021Review
- Microfluidics for Artificial Life: Techniques for Bottom-Up Synthetic Biology.Micromachines · 2019Review
- The Usual Suspects 2019: of Chips, Droplets, Synthesis, and Artificial Cells.Micromachines · 2019Review
- Review
- Review
- Article
- Multi-dimensional studies of synthetic genetic promoters enabled by microfluidic impact printing.Lab on a chip · 2017Article
- Open-source, community-driven microfluidics with Metafluidics.Nature biotechnology · 2017Article
- Droplet-based microfluidics for artificial cell generation: a brief review.Interface focus · 2016Review
- Reproducibility of Fluorescent Expression from Engineered Biological Constructs in E. coli.PloS one · 2016Article
- Mesoscopic simulation of single DNA dynamics in rotational flows.The European physical journal. E, Soft matter · 2015Article
- Engineering protocells: prospects for self-assembly and nanoscale production-lines.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2015Review
- Bridging the gap: a roadmap to breaking the biological design barrier.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2014Review
- Validation of an entirely in vitro approach for rapid prototyping of DNA regulatory elements for synthetic biology.Nucleic acids research · 2013Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We introduce microfluidics technologies as a key foundational technology for synthetic biology experimentation. Recent advances in the field of microfluidics are reviewed and the potential of such a technological platform to support the rapid development of synthetic biology solutions is discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.