Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19474037›Full record

ArticleProceedings. Biological sciences2009

Change in maternal environment induced by cross-fostering alters genetic and epigenetic effects on complex traits in mice.

Reinmar Hager, James M Cheverud, Jason B Wolf

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings. Biological sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Developmental Trajectories of Anhedonia in Preclinical Models.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2022
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Epigenetic programming of reward function in offspring: a role for maternal diet.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2014
    Review
  9. Article
  10. DNA methylation as a mechanism of nutritional plasticity: limited support from horned beetles.Journal of experimental zoology. Part B, Molecular and developmental evolution · 2013
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Behavioral epigenetics.Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences · 2011
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Reinmar HagerFaculty of Life Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK. reinmar.hager@cantab.net
James M Cheverud
Jason B Wolf

Funding

Washington University Nutrition Obesity Research CenterP30DK056341 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Jonathan R Brestoff · 1999 to 2026
$30.2M
Genetics Basis of Dietary Obesity in MiceR01DK055736 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHEVERUD, JAMES M · 2000 to 2009
$2.1M
GENETIC BASIS OF DIETARY OBESITY IN MICER56DK055736 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI CHEVERUD, JAMES M · 2010 to 2010
$354k
Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/C516936/1NIDDK NIH HHS DK055736NIDDK NIH HHS P30 DK056341NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK055736NIDDK NIH HHS R56 DK055736
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interaction between maternally provided environment and offspring genotype is a major determinant of offspring development and fitness in many organisms. Recent research has demonstrated that not only genetic effects, but also epigenetic effects may be subject to modifications by the maternal environment. Genomic imprinting resulting in parent-of-origin-dependent gene expression is among the best studied of epigenetic effects. However, very little is known about the degree to which genomic imprinting effects can be modulated by the maternally provided environment, which has important implications for phenotypic plasticity. In this study, we investigated this unresolved question using a cross-fostering design in which mouse pups were nursed by either their own or an unrelated mother. We scanned the entire genome to search for quantitative trait loci whose effects depend on cross-fostering and detected 10 of such loci. Of the 10 loci, 4 showed imprinting by cross-foster interactions. In most cases, the interaction effect was due to the presence of an effect in either cross-fostered or non-cross-fostered animals. Our results demonstrate that genomic imprinting effects may often be modified by the maternal environment and that such interactions can impact key fitness-related traits suggesting a greater plasticity of genomic imprinting than previously assumed.

Indexed as

Maternal BehaviorAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleGene Expression RegulationGenetic VariationMiceQuantitative Trait Loci

Identifiers

PMID19474037
PMCPMC2817211

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.