Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19471988›Full record

ArticleJournal of molecular evolution2009

A comparative approach shows differences in patterns of numt insertion during hominoid evolution.

M I Jensen-Seaman, J H Wildschutte, I D Soto-Calderón, N M Anthony

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of molecular evolution, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 17% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 37 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Chimeric mitochondrial peptides from contiguous regular and swinger RNA.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2016
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Mammalian NUMT insertion is non-random.Nucleic acids research · 2012
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

M I Jensen-SeamanDepartment of Biological Sciences, Duquesne University, 600 Forbes Ave., Pittsburgh, PA 15282, USA. seamanm@duq.edu
J H Wildschutte
I D Soto-Calderón
N M Anthony
Duquesne University · USUniversidad de Antioquia · COUniversity of New Orleans · US

Funding

Nuclear integrations of mitochondrial DNA in great apesR15GM073682 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEW ORLEANS · PI ANTHONY, NICOLA M · 2007 to 2007
$225k
NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM073682NIGMS NIH HHS R15 GM073682-01
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Nuclear integrations of mitochondrial DNA (numts) are widespread among eukaryotes, although their prevalence differs greatly among taxa. Most knowledge of numt evolution comes from analyses of whole-genome sequences of single species or, more recently, from genomic comparisons across vast phylogenetic distances. Here we employ a comparative approach using human and chimpanzee genome sequence data to infer differences in the patterns and processes underlying numt integrations. We identified 66 numts that have integrated into the chimpanzee nuclear genome since the human-chimp divergence, which is significantly greater than the 37 numts observed in humans. By comparing these closely related species, we accurately reconstructed the preintegration target site sequence and deduced nucleotide changes associated with numt integration. From >100 species-specific numts, we quantified the frequency of small insertions, deletions, duplications, and instances of microhomology. Most human and chimpanzee numt integrations were accompanied by microhomology and short indels of the kind typically observed in the nonhomologous end-joining pathway of DNA double-strand break repair. Human-specific numts have integrated into regions with a significant deficit of transposable elements; however, the same was not seen in chimpanzees. From a separate data set, we also found evidence for an apparent increase in the rate of numt insertions in the last common ancestor of humans and the great apes using a polymerase chain reaction-based screen. Last, phylogenetic analyses indicate that mitochondrial-numt alignments must be at least 500 bp, and preferably >1 kb in length, to accurately reconstruct hominoid phylogeny and recover the correct point of numt insertion.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenomeGenome, HumanPhylogenyAnimalsBase SequenceChi-Square DistributionDNA, MitochondrialDNA Transposable ElementsGenome, MitochondrialHumansINDEL MutationMolecular Sequence DataPan troglodytesPolymerase Chain ReactionSpecies SpecificityDNA, MitochondrialDNA Transposable Elements

Identifiers

PMID19471988
PMCPMC3140062
OpenAlexW2045013231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.