Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19471607›Full record

ArticleCurrent genomics2008

Genetic and Molecular Basis of QTL of Diabetes in Mouse: Genes and Polymorphisms.

Peng Gao, Yan Jiao, Qing Xiong, Cong-Yi Wang, Ivan Gerling, Weikuan Gu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Current genomics, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Peng GaoDepartments of Orthopaedic Surgery, Campbell Clinic and Pathology, University of Tennessee Health Science Center, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.
Yan Jiao
Qing Xiong
Cong-Yi Wang
Ivan Gerling
Weikuan Gu
Augusta University · USCampbell Clinic · USDiabetes Australia · AUUniversity of Tennessee Health Science Center · US

Funding

Molecular Phenotyping of NOD MiceR01DK062103 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI GERLING, IVAN C · 2002 to 2010
$2.1M
MUTATION SCREENING OF SKELETAL DISEASE MOUSE MODELSR01AR051190 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE HEALTH SCI CTR · PI GU, WEIKUAN · 2004 to 2007
$1.1M
NIAMS NIH HHS R01 AR051190NIDDK NIH HHS R01 DK062103
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A systematic study has been conducted of all available reports in PubMed and OMIM (Online Mendelian Inheritance in Man) to examine the genetic and molecular basis of quantitative genetic loci (QTL) of diabetes with the main focus on genes and polymorphisms. The major question is, What can the QTL tell us? Specifically, we want to know whether those genome regions differ from other regions in terms of genes relevant to diabetes. Which genes are within those QTL regions, and, among them, which genes have already been linked to diabetes? whether more polymorphisms have been associated with diabetes in the QTL regions than in the non-QTL regions.Our search revealed a total of 9038 genes from 26 type 1 diabetes QTL, which cover 667,096,006 bp of the mouse genomic sequence. On one hand, a large number of candidate genes are in each of these QTL; on the other hand, we found that some obvious candidate genes of QTL have not yet been investigated. Thus, the comprehensive search of candidate genes for known QTL may provide unexpected benefit for identifying QTL genes for diabetes.

Indexed as

candidate geneinsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM)mouse.polymorphismQuantitative trait locitype 1 diabetes

Identifiers

PMID19471607
PMCPMC2685644
OpenAlexW2092286609

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.