Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19470649›Full record

ReviewLearning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.)2009

Posterior parietal cortex and episodic retrieval: convergent and divergent effects of attention and memory.

J Benjamin Hutchinson, Melina R Uncapher, Anthony D Wagner

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.), 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06823193 (How Self-processing Affects Mental Time Travel), which is not on this map. Cited by 163 papers, 5 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
163citing papers in PubMed, 5 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06823193 narecruitingnot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

How Self-processing Affects Mental Time Travel: a Neuropsychological Study

TypeinterventionalSponsorIstituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri SpARan2024 to 2026Enrolled66ConditionsBrain Injuries, FocalArmsMental Time Travel task, Age Estimation control task, Lifeline task
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

163 citing papers in PubMed, 5 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Trial
  7. Trial
  8. Trial
  9. Trial
  10. Portraying the unique contribution of the default mode network to internally driven mnemonic processes.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2013
    Trial
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Memory in Psychiatric Disorders: A Review.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

103 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

J Benjamin HutchinsonDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California 94305-2130, USA. jbhutchi@stanford.edu
Melina R Uncapher
Anthony D Wagner

Funding

High-Resolution fMRI of Medial Temporal Lobe Mechanisms in Declarative MemoryR01MH076932 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WAGNER, ANTHONY D · 2007 to 2011
$1.9M
Neurobiological Mechanisms subserving Episodic and Incremetal LearningR01MH080309 · NIMH · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI WAGNER, ANTHONY D · 2007 to 2010
$1.3M
NIMH NIH HHS 5R01MH076932NIMH NIH HHS 5R01MH080309NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH076932NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH080309
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging studies of humans engaged in retrieval from episodic memory have revealed a surprisingly consistent pattern of retrieval-related activity in lateral posterior parietal cortex (PPC). Given the well-established role of lateral PPC in subserving goal-directed and reflexive attention, it has been hypothesized that PPC activation during retrieval reflects the recruitment of parietal attention mechanisms during remembering. Here, we evaluate this hypothesis by considering the anatomical overlap of retrieval and attention effects in lateral PPC. We begin by briefly reviewing the literature implicating dorsal PPC in goal-directed attention and ventral PPC in reflexive attention. We then discuss the pattern of dorsal and ventral PPC activation during episodic retrieval, and conclude with consideration of the degree of anatomical convergence across the two domains. This assessment revealed that predominantly divergent subregions of lateral PPC are engaged during acts of episodic retrieval and during goal-directed and reflexive attention, suggesting that PPC retrieval effects reflect functionally distinct mechanisms from these forms of attention. Although attention must play a role in aspects of retrieval, the data reviewed here suggest that further investigation into the relationship between processes of attention and memory, as well as alternative accounts of PPC contributions to retrieval, is warranted.

Indexed as

Brain MappingAnimalsAttentionDiscrimination LearningHumansMemoryParietal Lobe

Identifiers

PMID19470649
PMCPMC2704099

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.