Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19470154›Full record

Trial reportArthritis research & therapy2009

Prospective evaluation of serum biomarker levels and cartilage repair by autologous chondrocyte transplantation and subchondral drilling in a canine model.

Korakot Nganvongpanit, Peraphan Pothacharoen, Patama Chaochird, Kasisin Klunklin, Kanawee Warrit, Jongkolnee Settakorn, Nuttaya Pattamapaspong, Sirichai Luevitoonvechkij, Olarn Arpornchayanon, Prachya Kongtawelert and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Arthritis research & therapy, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 26% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Articular Cartilage Regeneration in Veterinary Medicine.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Korakot NganvongpanitBone and Joint Research Laboratory, Department of Veterinary Bioscience and Public Health, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Chiang Mai University, Chiang Mai 50100, Thailand. korakot@chiangmai.ac.th
Peraphan Pothacharoen
Patama Chaochird
Kasisin Klunklin
Kanawee Warrit
Jongkolnee Settakorn
Nuttaya Pattamapaspong
Sirichai Luevitoonvechkij
Olarn Arpornchayanon
Prachya Kongtawelert
Dumnoensun Pruksakorn
Chiang Mai University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe purpose of this study was to evaluate serum chondroitin sulfate (CS) and hyaluronic acid (HA) levels and the capability of cartilage repair of full-thickness cartilage defects after treatment with two different fundamental surgical techniques: autologous chondrocyte transplantation (AC) and subchondral drilling (SD).

methodsA 4-mm-diameter full-thickness cartilage defect was created in each of 10 skeletally mature male outbred dogs. The dogs were randomly separated into two groups. Groups A and B were treated with AC and SD, respectively. An evaluation was made at the 24th week of the experiment. Serum was analyzed prospectively--preoperatively and at 6-week intervals--for CS and HA levels by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and ELISA-based assays, respectively.

resultsThe cartilage repair assessment score (median +/- standard deviation) of group A (9.5 +/- 2.5) was significantly higher than that of group B (2.5 +/- 1.3) (P < 0.05). Group A also demonstrated a better quality of hyaline-like cartilage repair. Prospective analysis of serum WF6 and HA levels between the two groups did not show any significant difference. Serum WF6 levels at the 24th week of the experiment had a negative correlation (r = -0.69, P < 0.05) with the cartilage repair assessment score, whereas serum HA levels tended to correlate positively (r = 0.46, 0.1 <P < 0.05).

conclusionsAC treatment provides superior results to SD treatment, according to morphology, histology, and cartilage marker levels. AC treatment demonstrated a smoother surface, less fissure, better border integration, and a more reliable outcome of repairing cartilage. Moreover, a decreasing level of serum WF6, which correlated with good quality of the repairing tissue at the end of the follow-up period, was found predominantly in the AC group. Serum WF6 therefore should be further explored as a sensitive marker for the noninvasive therapeutic evaluation of cartilage repair procedures.

Indexed as

Arthroplasty, SubchondralAnimalsBiomarkersCartilage, ArticularCells, CulturedChondrocytesChondroitin SulfatesDogsFollow-Up StudiesHumansHyaluronic AcidMaleProspective StudiesTransplantation, AutologousBiomarkersChondroitin SulfatesHyaluronic Acid

Identifiers

PMID19470154
PMCPMC2714126
OpenAlexW2028760985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.