Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19468781›Full record

ReviewBasic research in cardiology2009

Coronary microvascular resistance: methods for its quantification in humans.

Paul Knaapen, Paolo G Camici, Koen M Marques, Robin Nijveldt, Jeroen J Bax, Nico Westerhof, Marco J W Götte, Michael Jerosch-Herold, Heinrich R Schelbert, Adriaan A Lammertsma and 1 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Basic research in cardiology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Angiography-based coronary microvascular assessment with and without intracoronary pressure measurements: a systematic review.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2024
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. "No-Reflow" Phenomenon: A Contemporary Review.Journal of clinical medicine · 2022
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Microvascular Coronary Dysfunction-an Overview.Current atherosclerosis reports · 2018
    Review
  16. Do we need invasive confirmation of cardiac magnetic resonance results?Postepy w kardiologii interwencyjnej = Advances in interventional cardiology · 2017
    Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Paul KnaapenDepartment of Cardiology, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. p.knaapen@vumc.nl
Paolo G Camici
Koen M Marques
Robin Nijveldt
Jeroen J Bax
Nico Westerhof
Marco J W Götte
Michael Jerosch-Herold
Heinrich R Schelbert
Adriaan A Lammertsma
Albert C van Rossum

Funding

Medical Research Council MC_U120084164
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Coronary microvascular dysfunction is a topic that has recently gained considerable interest in the medical community owing to the growing awareness that microvascular dysfunction occurs in a number of myocardial disease states and has important prognostic implications. With this growing awareness, comes the desire to accurately assess the functional capacity of the coronary microcirculation for diagnostic purposes as well as to monitor the effects of therapeutic interventions that are targeted at reversing the extent of coronary microvascular dysfunction. Measurements of coronary microvascular resistance play a pivotal role in achieving that goal and several invasive and noninvasive methods have been developed for its quantification. This review is intended to provide an update pertaining to the methodology of these different imaging techniques, including the discussion of their strengths and weaknesses.

Indexed as

Coronary CirculationHeart Function TestsMicrocirculationVascular ResistanceCardiac CatheterizationCoronary AngiographyCoronary Artery DiseaseCoronary VesselsEchocardiography, DopplerFractional Flow Reserve, MyocardialHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyPredictive Value of TestsThermodilution

Identifiers

PMID19468781
PMCPMC2722717

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.