ReviewDer Nervenarzt2009
[Cerebral CT and MRI in mitchondrial disorders].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The central nervous system (CNS) is the second most frequently affected organ in mitochondrial disorders (MD). In the majority of the cases, clinical CNS manifestations correlate with the CNS lesions on imaging and vice versa. The most important method to demonstrate CNS abnormalities in MD is the MRI. This imaging technique can demonstrate structural lesions, such as strokelike lesions, focal or diffuse atrophy, cysts or lacunas, focal or diffuse white matter lesions, grey matter lesions of the cortex or deep grey matter, and increased iron deposition. Functional abnormalities such as increased lactate in the white and grey matter or increased cholin in the white matter can be demonstrated by proton spectroscopy. Abnormlities of the intracerebral vessels can also be documented by MRI. Calcification and bleeding, however, are still more easily accessible by CT. Differentiation between disseminated, focal MD lesions of the white matter from nonactive MS plaques requires inclusion of the individual and family history and all instrumental investigations which are usually necessary to establish the diagnosis of a MD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.