Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19468663›Full record

ArticleOsteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA2009

The Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW): rationale and study design.

F H Hooven, J D Adachi, S Adami, S Boonen, J Compston, C Cooper, P Delmas, A Diez-Perez, S Gehlbach, S L Greenspan and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 91 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Update of the fracture risk prediction tool FRAX: a systematic review of potential cohorts and analysis plan.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Evaluation of a Multimodal, Direct-to-Patient Educational Intervention Targeting Barriers to Osteoporosis Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2018
    Trial
  3. Increase in Fracture Risk Following Unintentional Weight Loss in Postmenopausal Women: The Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2016
    Trial
  4. Frailty Change and Major Osteoporotic Fracture in the Elderly: Data from the Global Longitudinal Study of Osteoporosis in Women 3-Year Hamilton Cohort.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2016
    Trial
  5. Relationship of weight, height, and body mass index with fracture risk at different sites in postmenopausal women: the Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW).Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2014
    Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Effective communication regarding risk of fracture for individuals at risk of fragility fracture: a scoping review.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2022
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Adiposity and bone microarchitecture in the GLOW study.Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA · 2021
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Observational
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 18 institutions in 10 countries.

F H HoovenCenter for Outcomes Research, University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester, MA 01605, USA. fred.hooven@umassmed.edu
J D Adachi
S Adami
S Boonen
J Compston
C Cooper
P Delmas
A Diez-Perez
S Gehlbach
S L Greenspan
A LaCroix
R Lindsay
J C Netelenbos
J Pfeilschifter
C Roux
K G Saag
P Sambrook
S Silverman
E Siris
N B Watts
F A Anderson
University of Massachusetts Chan Medical School · USNIHR Oxford Musculoskeletal Biomedical Research Centre · GBAlfried Krupp Hospital · DEAmsterdam UMC Location VUmc · NLColumbia University Irving Medical Center · USHelen Hayes Hospital · USHôpital Cochin · FRHôpital Edouard Herriot · FRKU Leuven · BERoyal North Shore Hospital · AUSouthampton General Hospital · GBSt. Joseph's Hospital · CAUniversitat Autònoma de Barcelona · ESUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USUniversity of California, Los Angeles · USUniversity of Cincinnati · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USUniversity of Verona · IT

Funding

VARIABILITY, STABILITY & SMOOTHNESS OF WALKINGP30AG024827 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI JENNIFER S BRACH · 2004 to 2026
$28.6M
Medical Research Council MC_UP_A620_1014NIA NIH HHS P30 AG024827
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

summaryThe Global Longitudinal study of Osteoporosis in Women (GLOW) is a prospective cohort study involving 723 physicians and 60,393 women subjects >or=55 years. The data will provide insights into the management of fracture risk in older women over 5 years, patient experience with prevention and treatment, and distribution of risk among older women on an international basis.

introductionData from cohort studies describing the distribution of osteoporosis-related fractures and risk factors are not directly comparable and do not compare regional differences in patterns of patient management and fracture outcomes.

methodsThe GLOW is a prospective, multinational, observational cohort study. Practices typical of each region were identified through primary care networks organized for administrative, research, or educational purposes. Noninstitutionalized patients visiting each practice within the previous 2 years were eligible. Self-administered questionnaires were mailed, with 2:1 oversampling of women >or=65 years. Follow-up questionnaires will be sent at 12-month intervals for 5 years.

resultsA total of 723 physicians at 17 sites in ten countries agreed to participate. Baseline surveys were mailed (October 2006 to February 2008) to 140,416 subjects. After the exclusion of 3,265 women who were ineligible or had died, 60,393 agreed to participate.

conclusionsGLOW will provide contemporary information on patterns of management of fracture risk in older women over a 5-year period. The collection of data in a similar manner in ten countries will permit comparisons of patient experience with prevention and treatment and provide insights into the distribution of risk among older women on an international basis.

Indexed as

AgedAustraliaEuropeFemaleFractures, BoneGlobal HealthHumansLongitudinal StudiesMiddle AgedNorth AmericaOsteoporosis, PostmenopausalPatient SelectionProspective StudiesRisk FactorsSurveys and Questionnaires

Identifiers

PMID19468663
PMCPMC2690851
OpenAlexW2149098146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.