Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19468329›Full record

ReviewInternational journal of molecular sciences2009

Neuronal aneuploidy in health and disease: a cytomic approach to understand the molecular individuality of neurons.

Thomas Arendt, Birgit Mosch, Markus Morawski

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in International journal of molecular sciences, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Critical Evaluation of Methods for the Identification of Aneugens.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Cytogenomic epileptology.Molecular cytogenetics · 2023
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Somatic mosaicism in the diseased brain.Molecular cytogenetics · 2022
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Rapid initiation of cell cycle reentry processes protects neurons from amyloid-β toxicity.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Thomas ArendtPaul Flechsig Institute of Brain Research, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Birgit Mosch
Markus MorawskiPaul Flechsig Institute of Brain Research, University of Leipzig, Leipzig, Germany.
Leipzig University · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural variation in the human genome is likely to be an important mechanism for neuronal diversity and brain disease. A combination of multiple different forms of aneuploid cells due to loss or gain of whole chromosomes giving rise to cellular diversity at the genomic level have been described in neurons of the normal and diseased adult human brain. Here, we describe recent advances in molecular neuropathology based on the combination of slide-based cytometry with molecular biological techniques that will contribute to the understanding of genetic neuronal heterogeneity in the CNS and its potential impact on Alzheimer's disease and age-related disorders.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAneuploidyBrain DiseasesChromosomesDNAHumansMosaicismNeuronsDNAalu-repeatsAlzheimer's diseasecell cyclecell deathchromosomal mosaicismin situ hybridisationlaser capture microdissectionneurodegenerationslide-based cytometry

Identifiers

PMID19468329
PMCPMC2680637
OpenAlexW1992737995

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.