Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19468290›Full record

ReviewNature reviews. Endocrinology2009

Noninvasive imaging of pancreatic beta cells.

Willy J Malaisse, Karim Louchami, Abdullah Sener

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Nature reviews. Endocrinology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Beta Cell Imaging-From Pre-Clinical Validation to First in Man Testing.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Molecular imaging of β-cells: diabetes and beyond.Advanced drug delivery reviews · 2019
    Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Accurate measurement of pancreatic islet beta-cell mass using a second-generation fluorescent exendin-4 analog.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2011
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Willy J MalaisseUniversité Libre de Bruxelles, Brussels, Belgium. malaisse@ulb.ac.be
Karim Louchami
Abdullah Sener

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Noninvasive imaging and quantification of pancreatic, insulin-producing beta cells has been considered a high-priority field of investigation for the past decade. In the first review on this issue, attention was already paid to various agents for labeling beta cells, including 6-(125)I-D-glucose, (65)Zn, (3)H-glibenclamide, (3)H-mitiglinide, an (125)I-labeled mouse monoclonal antibody against beta-cell surface ganglioside(s), D-(U-(14)C)-glucose and 2-deoxy-2-(18)F-D-glucose to label glycogen accumulated in beta cells in response to sustained hyperglycemia, and, last but not least, an analog of D-mannoheptulose. This Review discusses these methods and further contributions. For instance, emphasis is placed on labeling beta cells with (11)C-dihydrotetrabenazine, which is the most advanced method at present. Attention is also drawn to the latest approaches for noninvasive imaging and functional characterization of pancreatic beta cells. None of these procedures is used in clinical practice yet.

Indexed as

Diagnostic ImagingHumansInsulin-Secreting CellsStaining and LabelingTetrabenazinedihydrotetrabenazineTetrabenazine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.