ReviewCurrent opinion in hematology2009
Umbilical cord blood transplantation for acute myeloid leukemia.
Review in Current opinion in hematology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Umbilical cord blood derived cell expansion: a potential neuroprotective therapy.Stem cell research & therapy · 2024Review
- Hematopoietic Stem Cell Mobilization and Homing after Transplantation: The Role of MMP-2, MMP-9, and MT1-MMP.Biochemistry research international · 2012Article
- Promising new sources for pluripotent stem cells.Stem cell reviews and reports · 2010Review
- Umbilical cord transplantation: epilogue.Seminars in hematology · 2010Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on byMyeloid disease.2009
Authors and funding
2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purpose of reviewTo discuss the recent advances in the field of umbilical cord blood (UCB) transplant (UCBT) for the treatment of adult acute myeloid leukemia. This topic is particularly relevant given the increasing use of UCBT and the plethora of clinical and biological studies being done to further optimize UCBT. RECENT
findingsWe will focus on clinical outcomes, results of nonmyeloablative UCBT, graft-versus-leukemia effect and graft-versus-host disease, the effects of UCBT on the immune system, and the role of multiple UCBTs and ex-vivo expansion. SUMMARY: Ultimately, these findings and research will allow us to expand UCB to a larger number of patients. In addition, a better understanding of the biology of UCB and subsequent manipulation of UCB and the immune system will allow us to improve the graft-versus-leukemia effect, improve engraftment, and decrease infectious complications after transplant.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.