Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19468270›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in hematology2009

Core binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML): is high-dose Ara-C (HDAC) consolidation as effective as you think?

Hervé Dombret, Claude Preudhomme, Nicolas Boissel

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in hematology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Hervé DombretDepartment of Hematology, Hôpital Saint-Louis, AP-HP, Paris, France. herve.dombret@sls.aphp.fr
Claude Preudhomme
Nicolas Boissel

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purpose of reviewCore binding factor acute myeloid leukemia (CBF-AML) corresponds to two distinct subtypes of AML characterized by recurrent favorable chromosome translocations, namely t(8;21) and inv(16)/t(16;16). Given the relatively good outcome of patients with CBF-AML, when treated with intensive chemotherapy including high-dose cytarabine, they are generally not considered as candidates for intensification with allogeneic stem cell transplantation in the first complete remission. The optimal treatment strategy (place of stem cell transplantation, best postremission chemotherapy, role of targeted agents) remains, however, to be defined in these patients. RECENT

findingsThe biological and prognostic heterogeneity of both CBF-AML subtypes, including gene mutation and gene expression profiles as well as molecular response to therapy, has been recently described. SUMMARY: These new insights in the heterogeneity of CBF-AML suggest that a tailored approach might be preferred to a unique predefined strategy to treat these patients.

Indexed as

Core Binding FactorsCytarabineDose-Response Relationship, DrugGene Expression ProfilingHumansLeukemia, Myeloid, AcuteMutationPrognosisCore Binding FactorsCytarabine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.