Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19467026›Full record

ArticleHealth services research2009

Racial segregation and disparities in health care delivery: conceptual model and empirical assessment.

Mary S Vaughan Sarrazin, Mary E Campbell, Kelly K Richardson, Gary E Rosenthal

Open access · bronzeAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Health services research, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed
10.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 74 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Observational
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Alternative Approaches to Characterizing Disparate Care by Race, Ethnicity, and Insurance Between Hospitals.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Measuring Spatial Social Polarization in Public Health Research: A Scoping Review of Methods and Applications.Journal of urban health : bulletin of the New York Academy of Medicine · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mary S Vaughan SarrazinCenter for Research in Innovative Implementation Strategies for Practice (CRIISP), Iowa City VA Medical Center, Iowa City, Iowa 52246, USA. Mary-vaughan-sarrazin@uiowa.edu
Mary E Campbell
Kelly K Richardson
Gary E Rosenthal
Iowa City VA Medical Center · USUniversity of Iowa · US

Funding

The significance of racial segregation for CV diseaseR03AG027286 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF IOWA · PI VAUGHAN SARRAZIN, MARY SUSAN · 2006 to 2007
$131k
NIA NIH HHS NIA R03 AG027286NIA NIH HHS R03 AG027286
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveThis study examines two dimensions of racial segregation across hospitals, using a disease for which substantial disparities have been documented. DATA SOURCES: Black (n=32,289) and white (n=244,042) patients 67 years and older admitted for acute myocardial infarction during 2004-2005 in 105 hospital markets were identified from Medicare data. Two measures of segregation were calculated: Dissimilarity (i.e., dissimilar distribution by race across hospitals), and Isolation (i.e., racial isolation within hospitals). For each measure, markets were categorized as having low, medium, or high segregation. STUDY

designThe relationship of hospital segregation to residential segregation and other market characteristics was evaluated. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to evaluate disparities in the use of revascularization within 90 days by segregation level.

resultsAgreement of segregation category based on Dissimilarity and Isolation was poor (kappa=0.12), and the relationship of disparities in revascularization to segregation differed by measure. The hazard of revascularization for black relative to white patients was lowest (i.e., greatest disparity) in markets with low Dissimilarity, but it was unrelated to Isolation.

conclusionsSignificant racial segregation across hospitals exists in many U.S. markets, although the magnitude and relationship to disparities depends on definition. Dissimilar distribution of race across hospitals may reflect divergent cultural preferences, social norms, and patient assessments of provider cultural competence, which ultimately impact utilization.

Indexed as

PrejudiceAgedBlack or African AmericanBlack PeopleHealthcare DisparitiesHospitalizationHumansMedicareModels, TheoreticalMyocardial InfarctionProcess Assessment, Health CareProportional Hazards ModelsQuality of Health CareUnited StatesWhite People

Identifiers

PMID19467026
PMCPMC2739036
OpenAlexW2044800231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.