Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19466589›Full record

ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2010

Utility of DNA postreplication repair protein Rad6B in neoadjuvant chemotherapy response.

Malathy P V Shekhar, Laura A Biernat, Nat Pernick, Larry Tait, Judith Abrams, Daniel W Visscher

Abstract readComparative Study
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Nano-delivery ofMolecular cancer therapeutics · 2018
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Malathy P V ShekharBreast Cancer Program, Karmanos Cancer Institute, Wayne State University, 110 East Warren Avenue, Detroit, MI 48201, USA. shekharm@karmanos.org
Laura A Biernat
Nat Pernick
Larry Tait
Judith Abrams
Daniel W Visscher
The Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute · USWayne State University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is a standard therapy for patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) and is increasingly used for early stage operable breast cancer. Not all patients benefit from it, and reliable markers for predicting response are needed. The cytotoxic effects of chemotherapy are mediated by induction of DNA damage in tumor cells. There is evidence that resistance to chemotherapy is related to enhanced repair of DNA lesions. The postreplication DNA repair (PRR) or translesion synthesis backup DNA repair pathway is critical for cell viability, conferring tolerance to DNA damaging drugs, and maintenance of genomic integrity. However, despite its importance in conferring tolerance to a variety of DNA damaging drugs including cytotoxic chemotherapy, the involvement of this backup repair pathway in chemotherapy response has not been studied. The Rad6B protein is a fundamental component of PRR. We have shown previously that the ability of breast cells to tolerate chemotherapeutic drugs correlates with Rad6B expression levels and PRR capacity. To determine whether Rad6B expression/distribution can be used singly or in combination with p53, Mdr-1/PgP, PCNA or beta-catenin as predictors of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, we analyzed posttreatment samples from 20 patients with LABC in a retrospective study. Only preferential Rad6B nuclear localization was associated with response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Nuclear exclusion with cytoplasmic overexpression of Rad6B was observed in some patients who failed to respond, but the association with response is not statistically significant. This is the first study to report that the postreplication DNA repair protein Rad6B could be used as an independent marker for determining response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy. This is an exploratory study and larger studies utilizing interim evaluations of Rad6B expression, its subcellular localization and repair activity are required to confirm its utility as a predictor of chemotherapeutic response.

Indexed as

Chemotherapy, AdjuvantNeoadjuvant TherapyAdultAgedBreast NeoplasmsDNA RepairDNA ReplicationFemaleHumansMiddle AgedUbiquitin-Conjugating EnzymesUBE2B protein, humanUbiquitin-Conjugating Enzymes

Identifiers

PMID19466589
OpenAlexW1996813392

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.