Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19466524›Full record

ArticleHeart and vessels2009

Favorable cardiac and aortic remodeling in olmesartan-treated spontaneously hypertensive rats.

Caroline Fernandes-Santos, Leonardo de Souza Mendonça, Carlos Alberto Mandarim-de-Lacerda

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Heart and vessels, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 40 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Pharmaceutical biology · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Vascular Protective Effects ofInternational journal of vascular medicine · 2018
    Article
  13. The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2016
    Article
  14. Aortic remodelling in chronic nicotine-administered rat.The Korean journal of physiology & pharmacology : official journal of the Korean Physiological Society and the Korean Society of Pharmacology · 2014
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Caroline Fernandes-SantosLaboratory of Morphometry and Cardiovascular Morphology, Biomedical Center, Institute of Biology, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Av. 28 de Setembro 87 fds, 20551-030 Rio de Janeiro, RJ, Brazil.
Leonardo de Souza Mendonça
Carlos Alberto Mandarim-de-Lacerda
Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular remodeling contributes to the progression of cardiovascular disease. Thus, our aim was to evaluate the action of long-term treatment with olmesartan on cardiac and aortic adverse remodeling and its relationship with blood pressure (BP) and tensile forces acting on the aortic wall. Five-month-old male rats were divided in: WKY group (n = 6), SHR group (n = 6), and SHRs treated with hydralazine 30 mg/kg/day (SHR-H, n = 8) or olmesartan 10 mg/kg/day (SHR-O, n = 8). Medications were administered for 16 weeks. The SHR group showed hypertension (189 +/- 4 mmHg), cardiomyocyte hypertrophy (+107%), interstitial fibrosis (5.7% vs 1.9% in WKY), and reduced intramyocardial vascularization (9.1% vs 22.8% in WKY). In aorta, the SHRs showed outward hypertrophic remodeling, increased elastic fibers content (+36%), and increased circumferential wall tension (CWT, 2.79 x 10(4) dyne/cm) and tensile stress (TS, 261.4 x 10(4) dyne/cm(2)). Hydralazine and olmesartan decreased BP (-45% approximately) and likewise CWT and TS (-45% and -35% approximately). Both medications prevented left ventricle remodeling, but olmesartan improved cardiomyocyte hypertrophy better than hydralazine. Hydralazine did not alter media hypertrophy, but it enlarged lumen diameter and increased elastic fibers. It is unlikely that olmesartan prevented all aortic alterations. Taken together, long-term control of BP alone is not sufficient to prevent aortic remodeling due to hypertension, but in myocardium it seems to be enough, except for cardiomyocyte hypertrophy. The differential action of olmesartan suggests that it is essential to block growth stimulation by angiotensin II in cardiomyocytes and vascular smooth muscle cells in order to better prevent cardiovascular adverse remodeling due to arterial hypertension.

Indexed as

AnimalsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureHydralazineHypertensionImidazolesMaleMyocytes, CardiacRatsTetrazolesVentricular RemodelingAntihypertensive AgentsHydralazineImidazolesolmesartanTetrazoles

Identifiers

PMID19466524
OpenAlexW2032756423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.