ArticleInternational journal of hematology2009
High-resolution melting analysis for a reliable and two-step scanning of mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the chimerical bcr-abl gene.
Article in International journal of hematology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Is high resolution melting analysis (HRMA) accurate for detection of human disease-associated mutations? A meta analysis.PloS one · 2011Pooled it
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
For relevant imatinib therapy against Philadelphia (Ph)-positive leukemias, it is essential to monitor mutations in the chimerical bcr-abl tyrosine kinase domain (TKD). However, there is no universally acceptable consensus on how to efficiently identify mutations in the target TKD. Recently, high-resolution melting (HRM) technology was developed, which allows gene scanning using an inexpensive generic heteroduplex-detecting dsDNA-binding dye. This study aimed to validate the introduction of HRM in a practical clinical setting for screening of mutations in sporadic sites of the chimerical bcr-abl TKD. All chimerical and wild-type abl TKD regions selectively amplified were used for HRM assays and direct sequencing. The HRM test had approximately 5-90% detection sensitivity for mutations. In contrast to mixture samples with mutant and wild-type cells, all mutant cell samples had indeterminate melting curves equivalent to those of the wild-type due to formation of only a homodulex. This issue was improved by the addition of exogenous wild-type DNA after PCR. Subsequently, HRM results gave a high accordance rate of 97.8% (44/45 samples) compared to the sequencing data. The discordant results in one appear to be due to unsuccessful amplification. Thus, HRM may be considered to be suitable for reliable scanning of mutations in the chimerical abl TKD in a clinical setting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
19466505What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.