Evidence-based emergency medicine/systematic review abstract. Is nebulized hypertonic saline solution an effective treatment for bronchiolitis in infants?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

1. Nebulised hypertonic saline (3%) among children with mild to moderately severe bronchiolitis--a double blind randomized controlled trial.BMC pediatrics · 2015
   Trial
2. Safety and efficacy of phenylephrine nasal drops in bronchiolitis.Iranian journal of pediatrics · 2014
   Article
3. Common pediatric respiratory emergencies.Emergency medicine clinics of North America · 2012
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Nebulized hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants.2008

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.