ArticleThe AAPS journal2009
"Fit-for-purpose" method validation and application of a biomarker (C-terminal telopeptides of type 1 collagen) in denosumab clinical studies.
Article in The AAPS journal, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.
- COPD association and repeatability of blood biomarkers in the ECLIPSE cohort.Respiratory research · 2011Trial
- Nutritional approach for inhibiting bone resorption in institutionalized elderly women with vitamin D insufficiency and high prevalence of fracture.The journal of nutrition, health & aging · 2011Trial
- Development and validation of a method for quantitation of CTx-1 for the assessment of biosimilarity of FKS518, a denosumab biosimilar.Bioanalysis · 2025Article
- Biomarker Assay Validation by Mass Spectrometry.The AAPS journal · 2022Article
- Quantitation of cytidine-5'-monophospho-N-acetylneuraminic acid in human leukocytes using LC-MS/MS: method development and validation.Biomedical chromatography : BMC · 2020Article
- Recommendations for Selection and Characterization of Protein Biomarker Assay Calibrator Material.The AAPS journal · 2017Article
- Quantitative hydrophilic interaction chromatography-mass spectrometry analysis of N-acetylneuraminic acid and N-acetylmannosamine in human plasma.Journal of chromatography. B, Analytical technologies in the biomedical and life sciences · 2015Article
- Calculations for Adjusting Endogenous Biomarker Levels During Analytical Recovery Assessments for Ligand-Binding Assay Bioanalytical Method Validation.The AAPS journal · 2015Article
- Validation of a ligand binding assay using dried blood spot sampling.The AAPS journal · 2013Article
- Long-term treatment of osteoporosis: safety and efficacy appraisal of denosumab.Therapeutics and clinical risk management · 2012Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Biomarkers are used to study drug effects, exposure-response relationships, and facilitate early decision making during development. Denosumab, a fully human monoclonal antibody against receptor activator of nuclear factor-kappaB ligand, profoundly inhibits bone resorption. C-terminal telopeptides of type I collagen (CTx), a bone resorption biomarker, provides early indications of denosumab effectiveness and informs protracted clinical outcomes (e.g., bone mineral density). Because of the dynamic relationship between denosumab and CTx, a precise and robust assay was desired. Thus, we adopted a fit-for-purpose approach to modify and validate a commercial CTx diagnostic kit to meet the intended applications of a quantitative pharmacodynamic biomarker for denosumab development. Seven standards were prepared to replace five calibrators provided in the kit. Three quality controls (QC) and two sample controls were used to characterize and monitor assay performance. Robotic workstations were used for standard and QC preparation and assay execution. Method validation experiments were conducted with rigor and procedures similar to those used for drug bioanalysis. The method demonstrated a linear range of 0.0490-2.34 ng/mL with four-parameter logistic regression. Inter-assay total error of validation samples in serum was < or = 26.7%. Extensive tests were conducted on selectivity in sera from target populations, specificity, stability, parallelism, and dilutional linearity. Applications to samples from numerous clinical studies confirmed that the CTx method was reliable, robust, and fit for use as an early indicator of denosumab effectiveness. Refinement supported the confidence for use in pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic modeling, dose selections, correlation to clinical effects, and formulation bioequivalence work.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.