Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19461962›Full record

ArticlePloS one2009

Anode biofilm transcriptomics reveals outer surface components essential for high density current production in Geobacter sulfurreducens fuel cells.

Kelly P Nevin, Byoung-Chan Kim, Richard H Glaven, Jessica P Johnson, Trevor L Woodard, Barbara A Methé, Raymond J Didonato, Sean F Covalla, Ashley E Franks, Anna Liu and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 135 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
135citing papers in PubMed
25.4field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

135 citing papers in PubMed, 440 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Expression and Engineering of Conductive Cytochrome Nanowires.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Comparative transcriptomics of closely relatedFrontiers in microbiology · 2026
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

75 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Kelly P NevinDepartment of Microbiology, University of Massachusetts, Amherst, Massachusetts, USA. knevin@microbio.umass.edu
Byoung-Chan Kim
Richard H Glaven
Jessica P Johnson
Trevor L Woodard
Barbara A Methé
Raymond J Didonato
Sean F Covalla
Ashley E Franks
Anna Liu
Derek R Lovley
University of Massachusetts Amherst · USJ. Craig Venter Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mechanisms by which Geobacter sulfurreducens transfers electrons through relatively thick (>50 microm) biofilms to electrodes acting as a sole electron acceptor were investigated. Biofilms of Geobacter sulfurreducens were grown either in flow-through systems with graphite anodes as the electron acceptor or on the same graphite surface, but with fumarate as the sole electron acceptor. Fumarate-grown biofilms were not immediately capable of significant current production, suggesting substantial physiological differences from current-producing biofilms. Microarray analysis revealed 13 genes in current-harvesting biofilms that had significantly higher transcript levels. The greatest increases were for pilA, the gene immediately downstream of pilA, and the genes for two outer c-type membrane cytochromes, OmcB and OmcZ. Down-regulated genes included the genes for the outer-membrane c-type cytochromes, OmcS and OmcT. Results of quantitative RT-PCR of gene transcript levels during biofilm growth were consistent with microarray results. OmcZ and the outer-surface c-type cytochrome, OmcE, were more abundant and OmcS was less abundant in current-harvesting cells. Strains in which pilA, the gene immediately downstream from pilA, omcB, omcS, omcE, or omcZ was deleted demonstrated that only deletion of pilA or omcZ severely inhibited current production and biofilm formation in current-harvesting mode. In contrast, these gene deletions had no impact on biofilm formation on graphite surfaces when fumarate served as the electron acceptor. These results suggest that biofilms grown harvesting current are specifically poised for electron transfer to electrodes and that, in addition to pili, OmcZ is a key component in electron transfer through differentiated G. sulfurreducens biofilms to electrodes.

Indexed as

Bioelectric Energy SourcesBiofilmsGene Expression ProfilingAmino Acid SequenceBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCytochromesElectrodesElectron TransportFumaratesGene DeletionGene Expression Regulation, BacterialGenetic Complementation TestGeobacterMicroscopy, ConfocalMolecular Sequence DataOligonucleotide Array Sequence AnalysisBacterial Outer Membrane ProteinsCytochromesFumaratesRNA, Messenger

Identifiers

PMID19461962
PMCPMC2680965
OpenAlexW2112216401

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.