ArticleBiological procedures online2008
A rapid microwell fluorescence immunoassay for cellular protein detection.
Article in Biological procedures online, 2008. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In this paper, we describe a simple, rapid, specific, sensitive, and reliable method, the FICP method (Fluorescence Immunoassay for Cellular Protein detection) which is readily applicable to the detection of proteins directly on cells cultured in 96-well plates. In order to illustrate this method, we report on the detection of two different proteins, the cell cycle proteins cyclin D1 and p21(CIP1/WAF1), in untreated and 2-cyclopenten-1-one treated breast cancer cells. When the FICP method was compared with Western blot procedure, FICP was found to be superior for many characteristics. By using this method, we were able to quantify biological effects of a specific compound on protein levels in non-lysed cells and perform statistical analysis. Therefore, we believe this screening assay could be very useful for detecting poorly expressed proteins and for drug development.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.