ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2009
Evaluation of 13q14 status in patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia using single nucleotide polymorphism-based techniques.
Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Which prognostic marker is responsible for the clinical heterogeneity in CLL with 13q deletion?Molecular cytogenetics · 2021Article
- Monoallelic and biallelic deletions of 13q14 in a group of CLL/SLL patients investigated by CGH Haematological Cancer and SNP array (8x60K).Molecular cytogenetics · 2016Article
- Evaluation of 13q14 status in multiple myeloma by digital single nucleotide polymorphism technology.The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD · 2009Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Deletions of chromosome 13q14 are common in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and other cancers, demonstrating the importance of this region in tumorigenesis. We report the use of two single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP)-based techniques to determine 13q loss of heterozygosity (LOH) status in 15 patients with CLL: (i) digital SNP (dSNP), where analysis of heterozygous SNPs detects allelic imbalances, and (ii) DNA sequencing, where LOH is identified by comparison of allelic peak heights in normal and neoplastic cells. The SNP-based techniques were compared with established molecular techniques, fluorescence in situ hybridization and multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification, to determine their utility and relative sensitivity. dSNP proved to be the most sensitive technique, identifying 13q14 LOH in 11 of 13 (85%) patients (95% CI: 55%, 98%) without the need for neoplastic cell enrichment. Three cases showed evidence of LOH by dSNP that was not apparent by other techniques. In 8 of 13 (62%) cases, partial or interstitial patterns of LOH were observed by dSNP. Our findings demonstrate that dSNP represents a useful, sensitive technique for the analysis of chromosomal aberrations that result in LOH. It may have applications for the analysis of other malignancies that are difficult to assess by conventional molecular techniques.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.