Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19460935›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD2009

Evaluation of the Abbott investigational use only realtime HIV-1 assay and comparison to the Roche Amplicor HIV-1 monitor test, version 1.5.

Michael T Pyne, Eric Q Konnick, Amit Phansalkar, David R Hillyard

Erratum issuedAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of molecular diagnostics : JMD, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

  • Erratum issued
5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Michael T PyneARUP Institute for Clinical and Experimental Pathology, Salt Lake City, UT 84108, USA. michael.pyne@aruplab.com
Eric Q Konnick
Amit Phansalkar
David R Hillyard

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Abbott Molecular's m2000 system and RealTime HIV-1 assay (RealTime) were evaluated for sensitivity, reproducibility, linearity, ability to detect diverse HIV-1 subtypes/groups, and correlation to the Roche AMPLICOR HIV-1 MONITOR Test, Version 1.5 (Amplicor). The limit of detection was determined using the second International World Health Organization Standard and Viral Quality Assurance standard material. Serial dilutions of four patient samples were used to determine inter- and intra-assay reproducibility and linearity. Samples representing HIV-1 groups M, N, and O were evaluated in the RealTime, Amplicor, and Siemens Versant HIV-1 branched chain DNA 3.0 (Versant) assays. Archived Amplicor-tested samples were tested with the 1 ml, 0.5 ml, and 0.6 ml versions of the RealTime assay. Probit analysis predicts a limit of detection of 21.94 IU/ml using the World Health Organization Standard and 26.54 copies/ml using Viral Quality Assurance material with the 1 ml assay. Linearity and reproducibility were very good between approximately 1.60 to 6.0 log(10) copies/ml. All three assays produced similar measurements for all Group M subtypes tested; the RealTime assay was the only assay that detected all three Group O samples tested. Correlation with the Amplicor assay was good, although the RealTime assay measured between 0.342 and 0.716 log(10) copies/ml lower on average, depending on the input volume. The automated RealTime assay exhibits excellent sensitivity, dynamic range, reproducibility, and group/subtype detection, albeit with consistently lower values than Amplicor.

Indexed as

HIV InfectionsNucleic Acid Amplification TechniquesDNA, ViralHIV-1HumansReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificityViral LoadDNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID19460935
PMCPMC2710712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.