Intensive diabetes management for high-risk patients: how best to deliver?

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Relationship between food insecurity and housing instability on quality of care and quality of life in adults with diabetes.PloS one · 2022
   Article
2. Diabetes: A Cinderella Subject We Can't Afford to Ignore.PLoS medicine · 2016
   Article
3. Complications and characteristics of patients referred to a joint diabetes renal clinic in Ireland.Irish journal of medical science · 2012
   Article
4. What can we learn from the recent blood glucose lowering megatrials?Journal of diabetes investigation · 2011
   Review

Corrections and comments

• Comment on
  Effects of structured versus usual care on renal endpoint in type 2 diabetes: the SURE study: a randomized multicenter translational study.2009

Authors and funding

1 author.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as