Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19459835›Full record

ArticleBiometrics2010

A likelihood-based trait-model-free approach for linkage detection of binary trait.

S Basu, M Stephens, J S Pankow, E A Thompson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biometrics, 2010. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

S BasuDivision of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, 420 Delaware Street SE, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455, USA. saonli@umn.edu
M Stephens
J S Pankow
E A Thompson

Funding

Methods for the Genetic Epidemiology of Complex TraitsR37GM046255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI THOMPSON, ELIZABETH ALISON · 2008 to 2017
$4.2M
THE GENETIC EPIDEMIOLOGY OF COMPLEX TRAITSR01GM046255 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON · PI THOMPSON, ELIZABETH ALISON · 1991 to 2007
$2.7M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM-46255NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM046255NIGMS NIH HHS R37 GM046255
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trait-model-free (or "allele-sharing") approach to linkage analysis is a popular tool in genetic mapping of complex traits, because of the absence of explicit assumptions about the underlying mode of inheritance of the trait. The likelihood framework introduced by Kong and Cox (1997, American Journal of Human Genetics 61, 1179-1188) allows calculation of accurate p-values and LOD scores to test for linkage between a genomic region and a trait. Their method relies on the specification of a model for the trait-dependent segregation of marker alleles at a genomic region linked to the trait. Here we propose a new such model that is motivated by the desire to extract as much information as possible from extended pedigrees containing data from individuals related over several generations. However, our model is also applicable to smaller pedigrees, and has some attractive features compared with existing models (Kong and Cox, 1997), including the fact that it incorporates information on both affected and unaffected individuals. We illustrate the proposed model on simulated and real data, and compare its performance with the existing approach (Kong and Cox, 1997). The proposed approach is implemented in the program lm_ibdtests within the framework of MORGAN 2.8 (http://www.stat.washington.edu/thompson/Genepi/MORGAN/Morgan.shtml).

Indexed as

Models, StatisticalAllelesChromosomes, Human, Pair 2Computer SimulationDiabetes Mellitus, Type 2Genetic LinkageGenetic MarkersHumansLod ScoreModels, GeneticQuantitative Trait LociGenetic Markers

Identifiers

PMID19459835
PMCPMC3118475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.