Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19458976›Full record

ReviewDer Anaesthesist2009

[Pathophysiology of capnoperitoneum. Implications for ventilation and hemodynamics].

A Vogt, B Eberle

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Der Anaesthesist, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Variations of nociception level (NOLBMC anesthesiology · 2025
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

A VogtUniversitätsklinik für Anästhesiologie und Schmerztherapie, Inselspital, Universitätsspital und Universität Bern, Freiburgstr., 3010 Bern, Schweiz. andreas.vogt@insel.ch
B Eberle

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Laparoscopic surgery was introduced into clinical practice in the early 1950s by gynaecologists. Technical improvements allowed its use for more complex and longer lasting procedures. Reduction of postoperative pain, more favourable cosmetic results, quicker recovery and reduced length of hospital stay proved to be advantageous when compared to open surgery. As a result progressively older patients with corresponding pulmonary and cardiovascular comorbidities and morbidly obese patients are now undergoing advanced laparoscopic surgery. Detailed knowledge of the respiratory and hemodynamic pathophysiology induced by capnoperitoneum is necessary to administer safe anaesthesia to such patients. This review addresses the most important effects of capnoperitoneum and recent research as well as the possible implications for clinical practice.

Indexed as

Carbon DioxideAnesthesia, InhalationHemodynamicsHumansLaparoscopyPneumoperitoneum, ArtificialPositive-Pressure RespirationRespiration, ArtificialCarbon Dioxide

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.