Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19458756›Full record

ArticleCancer informatics2007

Bioinformatics resources for cancer research with an emphasis on gene function and structure prediction tools.

Daisuke Kihara, Yifeng David Yang, Troy Hawkins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer informatics, 2007. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Daisuke KiharaDepartment of Biological Sciences, Department of Computer Science, Markey Center for StructuralBiology, The Bindley Bioscience Center, College of Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN,47907, USA. dkihara@purdue.edu
Yifeng David Yang
Troy Hawkins

Funding

Surface Shape Based Screening of Large Protein DatabasesR01GM075004 · NIGMS · PURDUE UNIVERSITY WEST LAFAYETTE · PI KIHARA, DAISUKE · 2005 to 2009
$1.5M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM075004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The immensely popular fields of cancer research and bioinformatics overlap in many different areas, e.g. large data repositories that allow for users to analyze data from many experiments (data handling, databases), pattern mining, microarray data analysis, and interpretation of proteomics data. There are many newly available resources in these areas that may be unfamiliar to most cancer researchers wanting to incorporate bioinformatics tools and analyses into their work, and also to bioinformaticians looking for real data to develop and test algorithms. This review reveals the interdependence of cancer research and bioinformatics, and highlight the most appropriate and useful resources available to cancer researchers. These include not only public databases, but general and specific bioinformatics tools which can be useful to the cancer researcher. The primary foci are function and structure prediction tools of protein genes. The result is a useful reference to cancer researchers and bioinformaticians studying cancer alike.

Indexed as

bioinformatics toolsgene function predictionmicroarray data management softwaremicroarray data repositoryprotein-protein interaction databaseprotein structure prediction

Identifiers

PMID19458756
PMCPMC2675499

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.