Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19458018›Full record

Trial reportThe American journal of clinical nutrition2009

Differential effects of daily snack food intake on the reinforcing value of food in obese and nonobese women.

Jennifer L Temple, Alison M Bulkley, Rebecca L Badawy, Nicole Krause, Sarah McCann, Leonard H Epstein

Registry-linked trialAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The American journal of clinical nutrition, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT00837694 (Differential Effects of Daily Snack Food Intake on Reinforcing Value of Food in Obese and Non-obese Women.), which is not on this map. Cited by 34 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
34citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT00837694 completednot on this map

Differential Effects of Daily Snack Food Intake on Reinforcing Value of Food in Obese and Non-obese Women.

TypeobservationalSponsorState University of New York at BuffaloRan2007 to 2008Enrolled65ConditionsObesity
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

34 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Trial
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Observational
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Influence of sedentary, social, and physical alternatives on food reinforcement.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Jennifer L TempleDepartments of Exercise and Nutrition Sciences, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY14214, USA. jltemple@buffalo.edu
Alison M Bulkley
Rebecca L Badawy
Nicole Krause
Sarah McCann
Leonard H Epstein

Funding

Food reinforcement-genotype interactions and eatingR01DA024883 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI EPSTEIN, LEONARD H · 2007 to 2010
$997k
Effects on Caffeine on Adolescent Behavior and PhysiologyK01DA021759 · NIDA · STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK AT BUFFALO · PI TEMPLE, JENNIFER L · 2007 to 2010
$587k
NIDA NIH HHS KO1-DA021759NIDA NIH HHS R01 DA024883
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundFood reinforcement, ie, motivation to obtain food, is associated with energy intake and obesity. Finding ways to decrease the reinforcing value of unhealthy foods may help with adherence to diets and maintenance of weight loss. Our previous study in nonobese adults showed that daily consumption of the same snack food (food consumed apart from meals) for 14 d significantly decreased its reinforcing value.

objectivesThe aims of this study were to replicate and extend these findings to obese individuals and to examine the effects of different portion sizes of snack foods on food reinforcement.

designFood reinforcement and liking were tested in 31 obese and 27 nonobese women at baseline and after 2 wk of daily consumption of 0, 100, or 300 kcal/d of the same snack food.

resultsWe found a significant interaction of phase, portion size, and body mass index on the pattern of operant responding for food. Obese women had a significant increase in food reinforcement after consuming the 300-kcal portion of food for 2 wk, whereas nonobese women had the opposite response. No significant differences were found on the reinforcing value with the 0- and 100-kcal portion-size conditions. Women in the 300-kcal group (obese and nonobese) reported a significant decrease in snack food liking from baseline to after daily intake.

conclusionsThese findings suggest that obese and nonobese women respond differently to the daily intake of a snack food and that this may not be a viable mechanism for reducing food reinforcement in obese women. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT00837694.

Indexed as

Reinforcement, PsychologyAdultBody Mass IndexChoice BehaviorCross-Over StudiesEatingEnergy IntakeFeeding BehaviorFemaleFood PreferencesHumansMotivationObesityThinnessTime Factors

Identifiers

PMID19458018
PMCPMC2709308

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.