ArticlePflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology1991
Effect of depolarizing and hyperpolarizing agents on the membrane potential difference of primary cultures of rabbit aorta vascular smooth muscle cells.
Article in Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology, 1991. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Kinetics of ATP-induced Ca2+ transients in cultured pig aortic smooth muscle cells depend on ATP concentration and stored Ca2+.The Journal of physiology · 1993Article
- Characterization of potassium currents modulated by BRL 38227 in rat portal vein.British journal of pharmacology · 1992Article
- Potassium conductance of smooth muscle cells from rabbit aorta in primary culture.Pflugers Archiv : European journal of physiology · 1991Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Vascular smooth muscle cells of rabbit aorta were enzymatically dispersed, kept in primary culture, and studied between days 1 and 7 in a bath rinsed with Ringer-like solution at 37 degrees C. The electrical membrane potential difference (PD) was measured with microelectrodes. The mean value of PD was -50 +/- 0.4 mV (n = 53). Cromakalim (BRL 34915), 1 mumol/l and 10 mumol/l, hyperpolarized the membrane potential by 9 +/- 1 mV (n = 11) and 15 +/- 1 mV (n = 53) respectively. Glibenclamide (10 mumol/l) abolished the hyperpolarizing effect of chromakalim (n = 6). Simultaneous addition of cromakalim and glibenclamide (both 10 mumol/l, n = 11) and glibenclamide itself (10 mumol/l, n = 7) had no effect on PD. In patch-clamp experiments in outside-out-oriented Ca(2+)-sensitive K+ channels, cromakalim increased the open probability (Po) only slightly and only with a cytosolic Ca2+ activity of 1 mumol/l. In all other series cromakalim had no effect on the Po of these channels. Forskolin (10 mumol/l) hyperpolarized PD by 6 +/- 1 mV (n = 13). The nucleotides UTP, ATP and ITP (10 mumol/l) depolarized PD by 12 +/- 1 mV (n = 7), 8 +/- 1 mV (n = 65) and 5 +/- 1 mV (n = 6) respectively. GTP, [alpha, beta-methylene]ATP and adenosine had no significant effect.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
Indexed as
Identifiers
1945763What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.