Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19457175›Full record

ArticleMolecular ecology2009

Microsatellite analysis of genetic diversity among clinical and nonclinical Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates suggests heterozygote advantage in clinical environments.

Ludo A H Muller, John H McCusker

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Molecular ecology, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Repeated losses of self-fertility shaped heterozygosity and polyploidy in yeast evolution.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Genome-Wide Screen forG3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2018
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ludo A H MullerDepartment of Molecular Genetics and Microbiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC 27710, USA. mccus001@mc.duke.edu
John H McCusker

Funding

ANALYSIS OF GENETICALLY & ENVIRONMENTALLY OVERLAPPING YEAST QUANTITATIVE TRAITSR01GM081690 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCUSKER, JOHN H. · 2007 to 2010
$1.4M
S. Cerevisiae Emergence of an Opportunistic PathogenR01GM070541 · NIGMS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI MCCUSKER, JOHN H. · 2005 to 2009
$1.4M
NIGMS NIH HHS GM070541NIGMS NIH HHS GM081690NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM070541NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM081690
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The genetic structure of a global sample of 170 clinical and nonclinical Saccharomyces cerevisiae isolates was analysed using 12 microsatellite markers. High levels of genetic diversity were revealed both among the clinical and among the nonclinical S. cerevisiae isolates without significant differentiation between these two groups of isolates, rendering a single origin of pathogenic isolates unlikely. This suggests that S. cerevisiae is a true opportunistic pathogen, with a diversity of unrelated genetic backgrounds able to cause infections in humans, and that the ability of S. cerevisiae isolates to cause infections is likely due to a combination of their phenotypic plasticity and the immune system status of the exposed individuals. As was previously reported for bread, beer and wine strains and for environmental S. cerevisiae isolates, the microsatellite genotypes indicated ploidy level variation, from possibly haploid up to tetraploid, among clinical S. cerevisiae isolates. However, rather than haploid, sporulation proficiency and spore viability data indicated that most S. cerevisiae isolates that were mono-allelic at all examined microsatellite loci were likely homothallic and self-diploidized. Interestingly, the proportion of heterozygous clinical isolates was found to be significantly higher than the proportion of heterozygous nonclinical isolates, suggesting a selective advantage of heterozygous S. cerevisiae yeasts in clinical environments.

Indexed as

Genetic VariationHeterozygoteMicrosatellite RepeatsDNA, FungalGenetics, PopulationGenome, FungalGenotypeMycological Typing TechniquesPloidiesSaccharomyces cerevisiaeSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Fungal

Identifiers

PMID19457175
PMCPMC2768266

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.