ArticleJournal of clinical laboratory analysis2009
Comparative study of amplification systems in immunoenzyme assays for the diagnosis of American tegumentary leishmaniasis.
Article in Journal of clinical laboratory analysis, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic accuracy of Enzyme-Linked Immunosorbent Assays to detect anti-Leishmania antibodies in patients with American Tegumentary Leishmaniasis: a systematic review.Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo · 2019Pooled it
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We compared the accuracy and reliability of three amplification systems for enzyme immunoassays in the detection of specific IgG antibodies for the diagnosis of cutaneous leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis in patients from an endemic area in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Partially soluble antigens obtained from the promastigote forms of L. (V.) braziliensis were used. For development of the reaction, two chromogens, 1,2-orthophenylenediamine (OPD) and 3,3',5,5'-tetramethylbenzidine (TMB), and a fluorogen, 4-methylumbelliferylphosphate (MUP), were tested. The performance of each system was compared using the following parameters: accuracy, intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), and area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Sensitivity was the same (97.4%) for all systems. The reliability was excellent (ICC = 98.6, 98.7, and 99.1%) and specificity was 93.7, 95.8, and 97.4% for OPD, MUP, and TMB, respectively, showing no statistical significance. Despite the absence of differences in the performance of the three systems, the use of TMB is suggested because of its operational advantages, such as low cost compared with fluorogens, easy manipulation, greater stability, and lower toxicity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.