Evidence map›Paper›PMID 19455375›Full record

ReviewIntegrative psychological & behavioral science2009

The ways of humans: modelling the fundamentals of psychology and social relations.

Ole Elstrup

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Integrative psychological & behavioral science, 2009. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Space cannot be cut-why self-identity naturally includes neighbourhood.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2011
    Article
  4. Biological roots of foresight and mental time travel.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2010
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Intentionality and interpersonal relations.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2009
    Review
  7. The ways of 'being' and 'becoming' human.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2009
    Review
  8. Integration of psychological researches under the scheme of subjectivity.Integrative psychological & behavioral science · 2009
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ole ElstrupDepartment of Psychology, University of Copenhagen, Øster Farimagsgade 5A, 1353, Copenhagen, Denmark. ole.elstrup@psy.ku.dk

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The present paper comprises a set of theoretical suppositions concerning three major subjects: the fundamentals of psychology (psycho-logics), the fundamentals of sociology (socio-logics) and the relationship between psycho-logics and socio-logics. First, it is argued that intentionality is the founding unit of psychology. On the basis of this supposition, three phylogenetic steps: sense, mind, and consciousness are identified and modelled. Subsequently it is argued that sociology builds upon five and only five fundamental types of relations: competition, transference, coordination, dependence and control. It is stated that any sociological network is composed by sets of these relations. Finally it is argued that psychology and sociology form a complex micro macro system in which psychological processes give rise to sociological networks that in turn constrain psychological processes.

Indexed as

Interpersonal RelationsPsychology, SocialSociologyAwarenessConsciousnessHumansMental Processes

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.